Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/713/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/713/2004 Généré par l'IA

Employment Status and Statutory Benefits Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/713/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the proper classification of a worker's status as an employee or an independent contractor for purposes of statutory benefits, where the worker claimed entitlement to benefits based on a determination that the working relationship was one of employment. The court reasoned that the evidence, particularly regarding the degree of control retained by the hiring party over the means and manner of the work, supported the finding that the relationship was one of employment, thereby qualifying the worker for the statutory benefits sought.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Employment Status and Statutory Benefits Dispute: The court reasoned that the evidence, particularly regarding the degree of control retained by the hiring party over the means and manner of the work, supported the finding that the relationship was one of employment, thereby qualifying the worker for the statutory benefits sought.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
statut professionnel prestation statutaire collaborateur libre conflits du travail prix de l'ouvrage délivrance d'un titre d'indemnisation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
C/11438/2003
Independent Contractor vs. Employment Status Dispute
A/2366/2004
Wages vs. Disability Payments Classification Dispute
C/11436/2003
Independent Contractor vs. Employment Status Dispute
A/3959/2006
Workers' Compensation: Employee vs. Independent Contractor Classification
A/2623/2004
Statutory Entitlement Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%$&#'&&'#'#(  #%$)#'&&*



+  ,+ ! -  +! -! 

'.  /0    $* 1  '&&* 



!  ! - (-   !-  -  !'!  ! "#$%&



( 

 2222222222  2222222222 )*+(, !  (-. . !.2! /00000000001 2--3

           ! "

   +647+  

  !.--(  .9 -(  ! !('', ( -2-. 9  11        1   : 1 )-+9%-3$:-0000000000  0000000000 )-+9%  !.2!3  !  ! 66 &- 6886 9(  '(   ! 76;<72=>

?(99(- -(!!.2! ? -(!-!57@-6886 .9( !!.2!!5A@- 6886>

 '--(! -B!.! !5(C 6887>

 ?-  -(!9 -B( '' !-! ('9 -( 9(!9 -!65( (B688755'- A9 'B688 9-% 9(!- >

?(!- & 9 -(D'(  !!('', '. 9-$5EE;52=F &.!;(99(- -(!'-9!.2!$! (>

!D?' -%!? -(9(B-- .B.? =6 1@,9   .-(!- & 9 -9(  D?-(- (2('$(->

  ?9%!.2!!& ?D- !( - -(*-,-B !?* $ -  ! 9  9. 9( 5FFA   5FF< !? 9    ! (! ! ( - -( !9(?.5FFE>

?-(&- !? .- (!=



GGGGG

 456746888  +747+  

  ! - 3   ,+ ! -  +! -! 

 4//   1

5/6   7  1   48 $9' -:;

5= ( $-!D'(  !!('', '.$ 5EE;52=F=

6= ( *!.2!!(!&'(  =

7=  (.D (!(  '-&. ! ?(99(- -( 2-  9 :- 0000000000 0000000000$!(=

= .B( 9 -! (  (( -(-(=

= - D9(.! , - =

E= 99- -(!? =8 -2('9 -!D?9& 2(' (( 9. # !!.-!78@(!%( -2- -(99- (''!.!. -B2.!.!1"H-I"(2D-EE88    (-*'9-=!.-9 # 9((,.='.'(-!(- J 3-!-D* ' D!.--(( !.-(B -- 9! !.--( D.>B3*9(9(D'( -2- -'9(&(-!'!   !.--(>39( -, (!(9.  =1-'.'(- ( -  9  (- ..'  .'.. (   3 B3   3 -+!  -B2.!.!9(9 ' -%(D?- !&!.-&B='.'(-!(' -(('(K ! 9& D- (  @(-  -- D  !.--(  D.   ?&(99 ! D. .*9.!-.( ) =57658E 58<3=

 ,22-J  .-! J   -- BB(-     



(9-(2('!9. #  ( -2-.*9 ---D?$?22-2.!. !(-9,22

 456746888