Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/712/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/712/2004 Généré par l'IA

Misrepresentation and Contract Voidability Based on Lack of Justifiable Reliance

Numéro de cause ATAS/712/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a lower court's decision that granted relief to a party based on a finding that a prior agreement was voidable due to material misrepresentations concerning the subject matter of the contract. The court reasoned that even if the representations were proven false, the party seeking to void the agreement failed to demonstrate that they reasonably relied on those misrepresentations as an essential basis for entering the contract, as the contract terms themselves provided mechanisms for discovering the true condition or status of the subject matter, thereby negating justifiable reliance on the alleged misstatements.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Misrepresentation and Contract Voidability Based on Lack of Justifiable Reliance: The court reasoned that even if the representations were proven false, the party seeking to void the agreement failed to demonstrate that they reasonably relied on those misrepresentations as an essential basis for entering the contract, as the contract terms themselves provided mechanisms for discovering the true condition or status of the subject matter, thereby negating justifiable reliance on the alleged misstatements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partie au contrat nullité du contrat validité de clause de non-concurrence interprétation complétive du contrat abus de droit violation de la bonne foi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ruled on the allocation of procedural costs in the dispositive.
Généré par l'IA
A/255/2005
Misrepresentation Voids Contractual Assent
A/43/2005
Misrepresentation Claim Fails to Void Contract
A/1953/2004
Contract Validity Due to Misrepresentation and Lack of Consideration
A/2168/2006
Agreement Voidability Due to Material Financial Non-Disclosure
A/311/2005
Appeals on Contract Validity and Inducement by Misrepresentation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ruled on the allocation of procedural costs in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#"$!"%%# !&'"!"%%(



) *)+ +,+  )+ ,*

-.  / 0  $ 1 0 "%%( 

  2

3 45555555555  

23

,44* +,+  6 ,* 731 2 3 !!)*  !!"#$%&'("

              

   .%+%.  

    , *)/ %&&,  0! 12222222222   *!!  33!!'")/%&&, 455!  4)3 !6

 4!  )3! 3   3!  % 7! %&&8    9 5)!!37***6

  $$:%&&8 !/ *5!)94  )!5!!;*!) *!!9**!"!<*6

 !3!%8:%&&86

  ,*4  *)+ +,+  )+ ,*



82393   :  133 3  ; '<" ,=

$=    !    0= 12222222222   *!!  ' ")/%&&, 455!  4)3 !6

%= > ? 6

,= 5)  3!   9@  3" 5)    3* A   * !  ,& 7 (  !5!! 3 3 ! ))* *  !/  5**    BCD!EC59! # #&&8     ! F)3 !=  * !  3 A 3 <*=  )*)! !G H !!9 F)9 *!! *!/! !3  *!! 9*6 /H F3 3 9  )!5 !  !) 3"! )   *!!6 H 3  !<      3*= B!  )*)!  ! 3  ! * *) *)**   H /H  H !.  !/ 5** 33)!( 9@!  "* !"/ =)*)!)! )>  3" 9!  7! !! 9  *!! 9*  @" 33  9  **F3*!*I=$,%$&#$&-H= <55!(G  *!G   JK E 0> )

 3!5) 3* A!5!*F3!B*!@ ; @*)!3 <55

 +%,%-'%&&,