Statute's Non-Retroactivity Bars Vacation of Final Judgment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA petitioner sought review regarding a decision that dismissed their application to vacate a judgment, asserting the lower court failed to properly consider a statute enacted after the original judgment was entered, which purportedly altered the legal landscape regarding the underlying obligation. The reviewing court determined that the statute, while relevant to the initial proceeding, was procedural in nature and did not apply retroactively to the final, non-appealable judgment in question, thus affirming the dismissal of the vacation application because no valid basis existed to reopen the matter under the applicable law.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute's Non-Retroactivity Bars Vacation of Final Judgment: The reviewing court determined that the statute, while relevant to the initial proceeding, was procedural in nature and did not apply retroactively to the final, non-appealable judgment in question, thus affirming the dismissal of the vacation application because no valid basis existed to reopen the matter under the applicable law.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis provision was cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Texte complet
!"#$%!"&&# !'&'!"&&(
)* +*, , ) * ,
(- . / 0$ 12 "&&(
!!!!!!!!!!"#$%$#&% ' %
%
(( ) '' * "+ %4$ ,-."#%/01"2022 23
*050*
+$##%+01%7066/+899%+8* :+%$ ; <" # = * 9$ > !!!!!!!!!! 8% + 44$+?
+8$+0@:47066/?
%%+0/A0661+%"#$%$#"#=* %?
3 , +*, , ) * ,
45161 7 811 1 9: $;" ,<
2B +%+%%+?
0B ,+CB D99E #$+% ,' ,
#94+#$%F%%%9$G#%#D99
50/2-5066/