Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/703/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/703/2007 Généré par l'IA

Software Development Breach and Unjust Enrichment Claim

Numéro de cause ATAS/703/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a contract where the appellant was to develop software, but the work was allegedly abandoned and incomplete, leading to a claim for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated a clear failure by the developer to complete the agreed-upon work, thus justifying the termination of the contract by the hiring party and supporting the claim for recovery of funds paid under the contract as restitution for the incomplete performance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Software Development Breach and Unjust Enrichment Claim: The court reasoned that the evidence demonstrated a clear failure by the developer to complete the agreed-upon work, thus justifying the termination of the contract by the hiring party and supporting the claim for recovery of funds paid under the contract as restitution for the incomplete performance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
enrichissement illégitime résiliation de contrat contrat de développement d'un produit violation de la bonne foi règlement du litige défaut apparent

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The decision orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
C/23445/2014
Software Development Contract Dispute and Termination for Defects
A/1933/2003
Contractual Breach and Unjust Enrichment Dispute
A/1441/2004
Contract Enforceability and Unjust Enrichment in Construction Dispute
C/25248/2001
Software Contract Dispute and Allocation of Fault for Project Failure
A/348/2007
Developer v. Property Owner: Wrongful Termination and Substantial Performance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The decision orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

            !"##$  $#!##$

%%

&' %()'* * * & '%* (

+,  !

  - ##$ 



 !"   #

#

  $ $$ %   ##& #!" '#()* +

                

   %-,(%  

 *&' * .(

 ' "  / ! -00&   $ $$ %     1" 2 134# ' 563# 4##  74# 8#  $!#419"' #' 7#: 3 "1## 3"!#";

 '   (. ! -00& 3"  #<#"  # ## " ':  8 ";

*(&%* * &%(

 4!"!#23#=>)=.#=5=/ 6?36# < @A 8# B##1 ###'"?2C#>) 4" "'#6""  #     ) #8 -000 @ A #? 2   4" "  C%!  .*!.DD/@ A;

!'"#'<6  C':#"#8;

 C#= >- = .   '"?# ' # 1C?# CE# !  8  " C ?#E###1" ##<'? C''# ': C1 ;

  3#= .. = (    #  .- '#!8 .D*>   '"   !##?@ ;>.0A%''8'? 3#=*D  %3##"1 "!'"##!# 34434423##"!'"##;

3 3  FF #<#" ' 3" #  E#  "" !!  ''# # E# #! 2   $ !! 8<#   !'"# 2 56 '3   "''# ! ";

3  # 8 2 3" 3#<#  # ## "  ''# '#4#;





,-.(/,-00&  %(,(%  

%  / (.  %()'* * * & '%* (



.= ##1#?8'"!#"=

-= !#  2  $ $$   !!8<# !'"#=

(= #1'" #6##=

/= 4!  '#   1C '?# 4!  #  '"# E#   "  (0 < :  #4# ':  8 4" " @$5GH541))00/  A'? !#:  # '84!"!#7#=*- 4" " 84" " .& < -00> @ IA;  !"!   #  1   !#4 # !9 '?#'#6# # ! #; # E#  "  8 4" " ' ? '#  ' ? "#1 7  #  3#= /-  I=  '"# E# #  ':  '  #?1"!!!9 '? ?#E#<#23?=  644:  '" #         II J$  J



'4! '"#E###4"7'#1C2C444" " #"'81'644



,-.(/,-00&