Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/676/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/676/2007 Généré par l'IA

Statute of Limitations Accrual Date Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/676/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the application of a statute of limitations in several cases consolidated for appeal, with the core issue revolving around when the limitations period began to run for various claims related to the defendant's actions across different years. The court reasoned that the applicable limitations period for all claims was the one specified in the statute relevant to the claim's nature, and it clarified that the limitations period began to accrue when the underlying facts giving rise to each claim occurred, rather than a later date proposed by the appellant, thus affirming the dismissal of time-barred claims while allowing others that were timely filed to proceed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute of Limitations Accrual Date Dispute: The court reasoned that the applicable limitations period for all claims was the one specified in the statute relevant to the claim's nature, and it clarified that the limitations period began to accrue when the underlying facts giving rise to each claim occurred, rather than a later date proposed by the appellant, thus affirming the dismissal of time-barred claims while allowing others that were timely filed to proceed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délai de prescription moment du dépôt objet du litige protection des droits acquis entrée en force statut en droit international privé

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the Appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

             !!

" "#

$ %&$ # "  $# "#%

#'()   *  +*          !" # $%&' %%& !&   (!&)&% *+ %%   &%   ##(   #,  # ,   & ! # ## # %# &+-."      &    %    !" #  $$! 



    

   +3/1+  

 ,%

06 7 +$%8( &!%!9:%$ 0%$&;%3442  & ' &! %& ' % ! $%   !&! < #   !&! ==  ! $%8   ## (   # ,  #    ,   #  ##  # 7 +$%8   96 # !$:  %  &%'  $%   !&! > & %  %: &%$%  ==  ! $%8  &% $&% '  %'   & =  6 :&   !"6

36 ( &!%!  !$!  $% 8%  (&  =   $%8    3.? &3441$%:=&!0--5&34446

26 % % % % $%'    00 ?' % 344@  %! &  % ;  '  (%% &    = !  A%  : =& " %$8%& &&% ;!?   ?A6

16 % !  20 B& 344@  ! "( &!%!& $%  : =& $%  $!%   0% $&;% 3442  20 ?' % 344@ !&& $%! !C8&&&  ; &$8%=&(==&%!%D $%8  (& =  $E%6

@6 @$&;%344@ %  =%! C!$ & +F' &==&! &!&!%D$%(&% %% !%! (&  =  6       C! "    $    !   % $%  &% $&% '  %'   &  =    2 ?  344@:&%C ' &% &"& 0% 344224 $&;%3441$ 80%=!'% %344@6

G6 % !    5 $&;% 344@ = %! % $$ &   3- % 3445     8 % %!! " ( &!%!  $ &     G(.44 =%6 %$%!&&& '%!"&%&0%$&;%344220?' %344@6

56 ( &!%! %$%!&! $% )&% + %%  * '& "   &%?&!%%@'% 3445&% &!  %$$ & 6

.6 %!$00 3445 %?&%%6

 "%

06 =%!&"H%&6@G %H%A & ?   %79 % ; &% &$!&&$%&&%$%!&6



/0121/3445  +2/1+   36 &%(%&650 %$%!%  &%& '03$&;%0-.@ 7 9 (&% &! $& (==   % %CF& %% ($$    & % &   &&  ?%  C & $& ; (F&% ==&! $% (   $%!%6     C 8%&  % & & ; A&   $%&  &  !   % ' &$$;6

26 ($8 && ?%  C % $%% &F&%==&! $%( $%!&$%!%6

?& = $%!C&($$%6



/0121/3445  +1/1+  



 # -" %,  %&$ # "  $# "#%

* . .   (

06 $$- * ///////////6

36   $%& &! ! +* $%!&% %6

26  &C %&" $ & A%==$%&& 6       %! &J A%== 8%     % +  I % K 

$ =%$%!&%&& = !:$%& $%A%==



/0121/3445