Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/649/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/649/2006 Généré par l'IA

Zoning Ordinance Notice Sufficiency Despite Erroneous Omission

Numéro de cause ATAS/649/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a statutory requirement for public notice of a proposed zoning ordinance amendment was satisfied when the published notice was erroneous, specifically omitting the subject property's designation as an area of potential environmental concern. The lower court found the notice defective, but the appellate court reversed, reasoning that the governing statute mandated publication in a newspaper of general circulation and that the omission, while a mistake, did not render the notice legally insufficient where the description provided was otherwise accurate and the public was not misled to their detriment regarding the nature of the proceeding.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Zoning Ordinance Notice Sufficiency Despite Erroneous Omission: The lower court found the notice defective, but the appellate court reversed, reasoning that the governing statute mandated publication in a newspaper of general circulation and that the omission, while a mistake, did not render the notice legally insufficient where the description provided was otherwise accurate and the public was not misled to their detriment regarding the nature of the proceeding.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
annonces publiques violation des règles d'affectation condition légale motivation suffisante validité du permis de construire règlement communal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited in the final order to regulate the distribution of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

The provision is cited in the final order concerning the granting of legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               &'())&*++, "&,)-&*++,

 "

 "  #"   # # 

#.  * % '' /% *++, 



  !



!

""       "   #  $% !./ !&!'($)!+,$-*--   *





      

     ! "#! $%

   3*0,3  

""

  43)5!6/!//).)7 .%8/9*((2)8%.%.*((2:

; %! % *< . *((2$  !  %/)/  %.% %;%.!/ % =>.?)5% ""       "   #  43)5 6:

; %! % 1 9 *((2$   %/)/  %.%  ).! )5 %  @%!%;# ":

 ) %/ % -< 9 *((2$    )/  ) % %! A ;%.!/%,-@A;!%!:

!%/)/))!!/$9)5A;))$%! %*(9*((2:

)%/%;%.!%)/%4!BC*B- 6$)!&% ../%!.!$)%;!!%;))!$%;!!! %@?.!%;# ":

 %   % -( . *((2  ! !! !! 8D % 8$ %/!E!%F!&%//.!)&! 9/)%$/?!E)/%)%;=.!)! ;)5:

%/)%-*@*((2$8./)!:

%;%%.)!)%)!$E;!!'@! *((2;&%!$%E/E$.)!!%!% %.%).!%!)5%@%!%;# "$!% %88/!//.!))!/));))A)$/!!%;%% )% ;!! % ;))!$ % ! E  %/ %! !   /!/ /:

;9!%%!:

!&!!)%$%!E%9! &@!!E)!G!7/%>B



0-1''0*((2  3,0,3    # " 1  "  #"   # # 

%

234 5   6     78 ',* $9

  4 -B /9&B

% 4

*B %!%;!%%/@!!A$%C.*((2B

,B !A%%%)%;!!%;))!B

'B ;7%.!!E%&B

CB !!E!%9&@!B

2B 7%>B

1B !E)/%!?!!B

<B 8.  )! %  EH )9! 8.  !  )/! G! %  %/ % ,( @ %5  !8! ) ) ..%/ %/  & 8/%/ % $ "=IJ=8E 2$ 2(('   $  ! K.)B  %/  )! G! )?/B  ./. %!L 6 %E K!.!E%/!%/&!!)%%/ !!E/: &6 K) ) E .!8  !. )9 %.% !! ! %/: 6 )!  ?!   %  )/!!B "  ./.  !! )  ! //.! /.//  !! 6 &6 ! 6 3%$  &8/%/%))!.!5EH %9%/9&B./.%.!.7 % )9$ E ! @!$  E  %/ !!E/ ! H9)) % E/!/K)/%/!4!B-,*$-(2!-(<6B  ?88  /%!L    " &"   

 )8.% )/! G!!!8/K)!!"/!!%H !!A H/.)?88



0-1''0*((2