Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/649/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/649/2004 Généré par l'IA

Tax Exemption Eligibility Dispute (1989-1992)

Numéro de cause ATAS/649/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over the application of a statute regarding property tax exemptions, specifically whether an entity qualified for a particular exemption for the years 1989 through 1992. The court reasoned that the statutory language, as interpreted through prior case law and legislative history, supported the conclusion that the entity's activities satisfied the necessary criteria for the exemption during the relevant period, affirming the lower court's decision that granted the exemption for the disputed years while reversing a portion denying it for a subsequent year based on subsequent legislative changes.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Tax Exemption Eligibility Dispute (1989-1992): The court reasoned that the statutory language, as interpreted through prior case law and legislative history, supported the conclusion that the entity's activities satisfied the necessary criteria for the exemption during the relevant period, affirming the lower court's decision that granted the exemption for the disputed years while reversing a portion denying it for a subsequent year based on subsequent legislative changes.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
franchises fiscales impôt foncier procès fiscal statut en droit international privé entrée en force de la taxation histoire du droit

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in order 2 to regulate the distribution of court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This article is cited in order 2 to regulate the distribution of attorney fees in the context of the appeal being rejected.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               %&&'(%)+,),-.  /%0+1%)+

 /

 /  -/   - - 

)2  34  "  )+ 5 )+ 



" 6666666666 





- /   -   7 -  348  ,,#- !"#$%&'()*+!



          !"  #"$

   $/.0$  

" 9"4"-,,"/56!,/3317,#-4"-,,44,," 2#,/3318 ,," ##,"+!9,$4+ :!7!" ;, <<<<<<<<<< 9,$4+  :  ", *  ,"#,- " =>#?   ?, - " 1@53A 7B 4  4-," " ( 6!, /331  0( "-#  /332C

 4 , " 0 6, /331    -  "-,, 4$"!  , ",C

,*"#""8 !,,,-4 , "-16,/331 8   -4"  / 6, /331 D8 !, -  ?, - " , E !E --# 44- "  4-"  D ,$* 8-!,"-7,,,!*1@AF27BC

8 " " ) 6, /331  ,  " -  ##,D-    -,"8 ,,7,D!?,-- 4",+"-4,#G##D,,C

8,,-,,",D-D88 "!"4"8,,0(6,/331 ,'-">-"! 6C

8*68'4-4",6,7,"'">B 



HHHHHH



 - / :  /  -/   - - 

"

;3<   =  >   ?$ &0) !@

(B ,D"! 6B

/B '">

0B ,D4-"?,B

 .(/012./333  $0.0$   1B 7#  4, "  D8 4! 7#    4- G "  "-, " 03 6 "+  ,7,, 4 4, ##"- "-  ,  7-"- "  I=J,&=7D, 5 5331     , E#4,B  "-,  4 G 4?-B  #-#, ",K : ,",D E#D"-,,"-, ,,4""-,, D-C : E4 4 D #,7 , ,# 4!, "#"   "-,,C : 4  ,?   "  4-B I,  #-#,  , 4  , --# -#--   : :  : ,$"  , 7-"-"44#,+D8, "!"-,! B#-#,"#,#' " 4! D,  6, ,, D  "-,, D-  8!44 " D--E4-",-9B(0/(35(3):B  ?77,K  -,"K         , I  I 



 4, 7# " 4- G  ,7,- E 4, ,, D8 I  4  ?77



 .(/012./333