Lien Modification Validity Under Statute Requiring Written Extension
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe dispute concerned the validity of a lien against property, where the underlying agreement required written modification, but the parties executed an oral modification specifying a different contractual period for the lien's duration. The court reasoned that because the lien statute explicitly required any modification extending the lien period to be in writing, the oral agreement extending the term was ineffective, and thus the recorded lien expired according to its original written terms, leading to its invalidation.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 66 al. 1 LTF; Lien Modification Validity Under Statute Requiring Written Extension: The court reasoned that because the lien statute explicitly required any modification extending the lien period to be in writing, the oral agreement extending the term was ineffective, and thus the recorded lien expired according to its original written terms, leading to its invalidation.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACosts were imposed on the appellant (Art. 66 al. 1 LTF).
Texte complet
&'()(&*++, "&,',&*++,
"
" -" - -
-. * $ ) #$ *++,
///////// !" #
$ $ ///////// !" #
%$
- 0 - 1 - ! ! " ! - " !$&'()%*+(*+,-*( !4$
2" " "" " ! 34 -5 %$% )% .$)/)%0((1 *2++3 "
! " #$ %
+50
2 "
*8 $9/%'9 +22:*,$;.$ $ .)$ ,$ % )$! -$##<<<<<<<<<%# $#<<<<<<<<<$ ! %+(!.$*'1*8
+8 =; 44$(9/%)$! %! $ .)$ ,$ %$! )$%/ )$ % ! - $ )$!-& )$4 > )$ ; !)?$%$ /8
(8 9/% -$%-!4 % 4+0@%+22:> $ -$%)$%/%!%!%$ A44 $ .!*7 +227 )$?!% )$%/8
08 $ .! %!)$% $ % %% )$!-& ) %$)! % %% !4$)$ % >$ %% - $ )$% > $% $ / % %$ +( !.$*'1*%+0@%+22:8
:8 =$$ $ B == A == = = = = = = (* +227)$%% > )%$ /)$# $#<<<<<<<<<% 0+*A+'1 4$8 '2 4$8 % :+1A::7 % % ! % )$%% $ / - %!$C%D% -$ %*26A:+64$8*2
##<<<<<<<<<A)% !% %$)$!-&)$4 -% $ /%A)A% - %!$% -)$ %8
78 %!%!%$ ?)$% %*'9 +22789$ % $ >!>AD!4%A.$-% A (29 +227$$C%$ %$$ %%.8
68 A.A.9% ! 4 ?!!%!/$!D9/$8
"
*8 A$%8+: 4!!$$ .$)/)$!-&)$4
- $- -%% - %!*6!.$*''(EFG%$!- /$ *$9- $+222$,/)$!$ -$8$>9 %% )H$$)$%% $% D)$%/$E$%8*++%*+( - B G 9/ -$)!%%A$%86(8* 4!!$$ )$!-& )$4 +: 9 *'1+ EG % D ,- $ . %$ ) *$@%+22( %)$,>A44 $
5*6065+227 (50
!%!%$ E$%8*0+ G?!%$A44 )$%/$. ! $!)$% % !%$ !)$9/ -$8
+8 =A$%8++FE-%$- /$) *$9- $+222G -$ )$%% $% > $% $ / % )$%/! 4$!% ?$%8*++*+(*0*%*0+ I$%8(D: FA)) >% )$/ %%D%$4!$$E8*G8$;>9 %)$%% $% D)$%/$$$)D 44!$%$)$%% $% /%! - $ .$ )/ ? %% !-%% % -$ % )$%% $% /%!- $ .$)/? %%!-%% % $ /E48$%8+0FG8$9% D )$%% $% % D A- $ .$ )/ ? %% % $ / %!$C% % -$ E F *+1 +(2I F*+'000G8
H), 9/ )$ ,$ % $! )$%/ )$ % ! )$%% $% > $% $ / )$ $8 % )$% %%H)$%$ /+(!.$*'1*H%$)$% +0@%+22:%D>9/% -$%-?!% $8
(8 = A %$% $ )$%% > )% $ / )$ # $#<<<<<<<<<%0+*A+'14$8'2 %!$C%&%!9D!%!!)$ A % %% )$!-& !4$ !%% $))! > # #<<<<<<<<< A)% !)%$!$ / A%$> %D ?B!)%%+*2A70'4$80:E0+*A+'14$8'2J+G8
08 4$!% D 9$ )$ ) 9$ !%$ % )$ )$%/ 9>A%%$4$%)$%% $% $9 % -$!.!!4 $%%)$%% $ %D %!$C%)% $$ %%B 8 %!$C%%!%? !/A$%8*+ A$$)$!-&)$4 - $- -%% - %! *1 -$ *'10 E +G %? $!/% $ B % )!$ $ E F). !(752+*19 %+22(G
:8 !% $ )$K )$!$ !%% /$% % E$%8 6( 8 + % 1'"8* $)$!$ %$% -*+)%.$*'1:G8
LLL
5*6065+227 050
- " 2 " -" - -
$
678 9 : ;% ',* <=
*8 - %F = = 3M "D-$ $ )%4-$##<<<<<<<<<8
+8 - % B == A == = = = = = = D %$4!$$ )%# $#<<<<<<<<<+*2A70'4$80:DF = = 3M "4-$##<<<<<<<<< > %!$C% )% $ !$% , +0 @% +22:9>A%%$4$%8
(8 H&%%>. 8
08 %>)$!$%/$% %8
:8 4$ )$% >A )-% 4$$ $$ %$ )$!% $$C% ! (2 9$ , % 4 % )$ ) $! $! $ . 4!!$ $ =;N O$;4> 7 7220 %$ ?) $8 ! )% C%$ )$/!8 ! $ % J G >$ ?%% > ! $$% ! $ .% $ % ) ! %%>!I.G?)$)$>% 4 % )- $$%% %$! IG)$%$ /%$$)$!%%8= ! $ % % ) %$ !!% !!$! %%$ G .G % G B $ .4!!$$)$$)%$$% ,$$$$>A -$!$$ $$-.8! $$$% $$& )$- > $% 9 % > ! %%>! % A-)) >!%!?)! !$$%E$%8*(+*27%*21G8 /$44 $ $! %J $$ = .=
) 4$)$!%$$C%%% 4 !?)$% >HDH44 4!!$ $ )$/$44
5*6065+227