Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/606/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/606/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Ambiguity and Parol Evidence Admission

Numéro de cause ATAS/606/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a lower court's ruling concerning a contractual dispute over material specifications, specifically arguing that the trial court improperly admitted parol evidence to interpret the contract terms regarding a required quantity. The appellate court found that the contract language was ambiguous as to the precise meaning of the specification, thus permitting the introduction of extrinsic evidence to ascertain the parties' intent regarding the quantity involved in the agreement, affirming the judgment where the ambiguity was resolved in favor of the prevailing party based on the admitted evidence.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Ambiguity and Parol Evidence Admission: The appellate court found that the contract language was ambiguous as to the precise meaning of the specification, thus permitting the introduction of extrinsic evidence to ascertain the parties' intent regarding the quantity involved in the agreement, affirming the judgment where the ambiguity was resolved in favor of the prevailing party based on the admitted evidence.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partie au contrat notion de décision clause abusive interprétation complétive du contrat motifs de preuve cahier des charges

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the final order regarding the imposition of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/2332/2003
Contract Interpretation and Extrinsic Evidence
A/2751/2006
Contract Ambiguity and Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence
A/1968/2006
Contract Interpretation and Parol Evidence Rule
A/2375/2007
Contractual Ambiguity and Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence
A/2187/2007
Judgment Upheld on Contract Interpretation and Evidence Admission

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the final order regarding the imposition of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               #$%&#'((% )#

)

* )+* ),  * ,+

-. &  '$ !  '((% 



 !"#$ % "#"

"# !"#$ &  '



(

) *   *  !"#(( "$5" "#+(",+-!+(.//0!01223 4



   

        ! "

  269  

 /+)

7: ;-#("22;2119!77<#=#," ,"+#<( +$  "( " #- (($  0 # 2117  # + "# !$ 7>8>!( ! $7>.2:

2: *  =55 2 " "+(5 " ;-#( +$($!  , " +#< ("$+(-+#($"?"+$?@+5 A+="$+B"(#-:

/: ;-#(""? ("?"$5(5/"$#,2119( $($ (# "C55 ,"$70;?2118+B$("+(-:

.:  ,"$($"+(#"((("+$?@! +(+$((("$5"+("##A #(( " ?  " +( A "(  #-! ( (  0 # 2117(/"$#,2119:

9: *   "       * * " 2D ? 2118!  "#"( ($ ""+75$?2112!++( "C+((",+-:*+(("("0C00/5:71/7;( 211.  $($ (5$$ E  )  *    *    E 3=:

8: "72#2118!) *   *   E 3="$  ," $?$" #+(""#" B(#"A+(("(C$<?E0C>D75:91/"$#,2119:

D: (+$ +  , " $ A( E  +$" " 7 F( 2119  / "$#,2119!"#"C(+#5($: "#" +"( +"( *:

0:  ,A" (-?"#+(B(( "#+("?"""#":"(#-!"#"($ EC *((A+""("$+"(:5#$ ,! +  " / ; 2118! AC C?( + ($  "B<# + "+  (("5""+$?@7>>1+#((E#+(: (E "#"! CB(( "  #+( "?"  #(! =#  *!(#+@"+211.:

>:  "#( ( $($ (# B +(  "( " 72 ; 2118 ($($-"$E;-:

    678.62118 /69  

 ,+)

7: C(:29"5$"$,+-"+$?@+5! ?!??((?"($"7D"$#,7>>/G)H!($?- 7;?2111!<-+$"""?:A;(( +"I"+(("(E+(-G(:722(72/ " ?& H! ;-"""?#+$(("C(:D/:7"5$"$ +$?@ +5 " 29 ; 7>02 GH! ( E <?  , (""+7F(211/!"(!+<AC55  $($(#G(:7.2 H!B$("C55+(-," $" $+(("$(#$+;-""?:

2: *C(:22)G?(?-"+7;?2111H! " "?!  +(( " ( A "(  #- ( +(-$ 5#$#( B(:722!72/!7.7(7.2 J(:/E9 )C++A( +-#((E(5$G:7H:=A;(!+((" (E+(-+"E"55$(+(("(!-#($ " ? " , +- B(( $?(#(  ##( " "?! (  +(("(!-#($"?",+-B(($?(#( ##(""#-G5:(:2.)H:!;( E  +(( " ( ( E C? " , +- B((  ##( "   " #-  ($K( "  ##( " "? G ) 720  2/1J )72>...H:

 I+<!  ;- " +#< (  "$  +(- + #($ " +(( " ( A "(  #- +  "#"! ( +  +$""0#2117/"$#,2119!"(EA;-#(""? ("?B$(:

/: *"#(+"(!"#"B(?($"$+"((C +($"B<#+:

+((A+"(#-+"#"C$<?E0C>D75:91 /"$#,2119!($K(#+!&"($AEB&$+B #($"#((!(.C.095:D9:

.: 5#$#( E  ;+"! "+  ; "$(#( +  +(- ;AC##("(5("+(("(""#!;( "?$,$$5"((+(("(E"($K(#+( #(("&: ($K(($(B###$-C(:72 "C"+$?@+5?!??((?"($

    678.62118 .69  

" 70 ? 7>0. G 2H    (B $-#(!  & ( +$ G )+,$/8612"70;(211/H

9:  $##(   +L!  +$" $(( -(( G(: D/ : 2  ( 0>4:7"+$""#((?"72+(#,7>09H:



MMM



    678.62118 969  

  ,)+/  )+* ),  * ,+

 

012 3  4   5" $%' , 6

7: ?() *   *  E3=E(5$! "#+(""# !$ !##".C.095: D9 E   5? "    !  A " ($K( #+(   " "$(! "<  / "$#, 2119 ;AC ##("(5(:

2: I@"#((A",:

/: (A+$"(-((:

.: 5#  +( "  AC +?( 5#  (  +$( K( "  "$ " /1 ; "<  (5( + + ##"$ "$  , 5$"$ " ! *=NO=5A 8! 811.   !  ( B#+:  "$  +( K( +-$:  #$# "( P H "A B(#( A "$  ( "$ ,(   ( + "  "$((A$J,HB++A#(5(#+?"#"(( ("$JH+(-("+$((:*#$#  (( +  ( $$#( $#$$  (( H ,H ( H &"!  ,5$"$"++(#(<AC "?"$?,:#$#"#(#@ " +?! A ( ;(!  A  "$ ((A$ ( C?++ " A$($B+$"$(G(:7/2!718(710H:  -55  $"(P             Q"       

+5#"+$(K(((5$B+(AIEI555$"$ "+-55

    678.62118