Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/605/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/605/2005 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of Evidence Despite Procedural Errors

Numéro de cause ATAS/605/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned the validity of a prior ruling in which the court determined that certain evidence was admissible, despite objections based on procedural errors in the collection of that evidence, because the errors did not implicate fundamental constitutional rights and the evidence was otherwise reliable and material to the facts. The court reasoned that the evidence was properly admitted because the exclusion of the evidence would have substantially prejudiced the proponent's case and the procedural flaws were not sufficient to warrant a reversal under the applicable standard of review, distinguishing the situation from cases where rights to counsel or freedom from coerced testimony were violated.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Admissibility of Evidence Despite Procedural Errors: The court reasoned that the evidence was properly admitted because the exclusion of the evidence would have substantially prejudiced the proponent's case and the procedural flaws were not sufficient to warrant a reversal under the applicable standard of review, distinguishing the situation from cases where rights to counsel or freedom from coerced testimony were violated.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arrêts en appréciation de validité griefs de procédure erreur de fait erreur manifeste défaut de preuve degré de la preuve

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'()%)' !%+*,%),

!

 !  -!  - - 

-./  )

# , "# ), 



 !"#$%#&  &&!" " "# '#"  ( "&)$ #



 #"

*( ) &#&%



            !  "# $

   1/+21  

" "! "%&3#&43&#/00-)"%! /43&#/00-# !&5 &"6

  &   !"#&  !"   !"#&  ,7  $8" /00-) - 3$&")2&#/93&/00:6

 ; " &#"$ #"  !"#&   #"<  "&    &##&  =& $8&&#%)!"&2,%8"/00- #%"% &""% $"8>  *(  ? ((@ =""  ("$&  ;"1 & ?( @ ! "  8#&"  !&#>  " =% /00:)   #"!""%"A!"5( ! " 8#&"8&B" &#> "&")#!"C&!&D) ((!" ! E)B&=!#) & $"" ! "    # #  !#   ##  2=94, F"> /0 "#&F  % !# !" &# !"  ((  #  2 F%$"&" /00:) =&&  2, 3&# /00: "    !# ! #,.12--,..17? # A"&@6

;& $&#;#%"&"# "B&##"E!" %">

 - ! 1  !  -!  - - 

# 233   4

536// 7   4     2$ &+) 89

,>   # E  (( B; "&   ;%## ;& $8&&#%   G& ) #  !"&   2, %8" /00- %## &""% $"8)  " ED&C"!&#!">

/>   # E  *(     CC# E $"" E  G&  ! "    # #  !#   ##  2=94, F"> /0 "#&F  % !#!" &#!" ((#2F%$"&"/00:)=&&2,3&#/00:"   !#! #,.12--,..17? # A"&@>

2> ;G ##B8 &>

-> $ &! ""!!"#&("$&;"1&>

:> &#B!" %"#C"#&#>



+,-./+/00-  12+21   7> !!&#& ;"#>:0 )&F "!"#&B;!$#F "" " " #"!"%#""H#%&203 "5 #&F&#& !"!& " %"% "&8F%%"")(AI&J"A FB&7)700-   )#" &D!&">%&!#H#"!"  C%>% &" &#< @&&B"D##B%&& " "#%&" 8#&"&#! %&& ##B%68@D! "! "B #&F&#&! $ &""## #"%&& 6@! "#"&C#"  "!"%##>(&% &"  #&# !  #" & %%# %%"%   ##" @ 8@ # @ &1)  "&8F%%""! ""!#""#&5""" "B;& $"%""&""$8>% &"" "#& " " G  !"$) B& " # 3 &#) && B  %&&  ##B% # ;$ !!  B%#%D!%&%" "#?"#>,2/),07#,09@>



    C"FF&"< "%&#<       K&    8(



  !&  F "  !"%# ""H# #  #&F&% D !"#& #  &B% E #&#" ;&F "#& ( )!"C"FF





+,-./+/00-