Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/60/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/60/2007 Généré par l'IA

Governmental Liability for Employee Deviation During Personal Errand

Numéro de cause ATAS/60/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed whether a governmental entity was liable for damages arising from an employee's operation of a vehicle, where the employee was driving outside of authorized travel routes on a personal errand. The court reasoned that liability could attach if the employee was acting within the general scope of employment, even if the specific act was unauthorized or contrary to instructions, provided the act was incidental to or reasonably foreseeable from the employment duties; however, the court ultimately found that the deviation to conduct a purely personal errand represented a significant departure from the scope of employment, thus negating vicarious liability for the resulting incident.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Governmental Liability for Employee Deviation During Personal Errand: The court reasoned that liability could attach if the employee was acting within the general scope of employment, even if the specific act was unauthorized or contrary to instructions, provided the act was incidental to or reasonably foreseeable from the employment duties; however, the court ultimately found that the deviation to conduct a purely personal errand represented a significant departure from the scope of employment, thus negating vicarious liability for the resulting incident.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
responsabilité personnelle violation d'obligations contractuelles de travail usage d'un véhicule automobile accident bagatelle indemnité pour inconvénients responsabilité de l'administrateur officiel
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"#$ %&&'  '& %&&"

((

 () ))  () 

*+ ,  %, -. %&&" 



 !"#$!%&'(   !#)* * +$*""#,$*""-*   $



*

 .///  //  / *#$ )*&0!1''% 

          

   5&215  

*6*$%(#&''47

$)"%16&''47

$*")**)8)"*7

  ))* ",9)* "  : #" " $")** " &% ;* &''4 ##:$),<<*",5+"*$&+#=&''47

"$",  ./// *<$*"*"&&+#=&''4 ) :  *  "$  ))* " %1 <$+ &''4! "#* ,))* <#$ *  "$ " 4 6* &''(    :  #** " ,"#*$ 68$ ",)8*9",)*$"*+"%''> ?)*"% 6&''(7

"$",  ./// *<$*"*"&&+#=&''4 *@*"#*$68"%'%<A(B)6"8%6&''(* $**<","#*$68"%3,1C0<A(())$""%6&''( 1%*=&''47

   " * " % "$#= &''4  "$* "," +  *""$")  ./// &&+#=&''47

   "  #"* " * " %% "$#= &''4 **  "**""$)7

(  /0  () ))  () 

  1223   4

52363++ 7 18 9' :  ;

%A  * ?  . ///  "  "$ "   #** " ,"#*$68=",*9",)*$"*+"%''>"8 %6&''(A

&A D@"#**:"=A

1A  * ?  . ///  "  "$ ",*@ ?  "#*$68"%'%<A(B"8%6&''(*"



2%0132&''4  51215   +$**<"%3,1C0<A(())$""%6&''(1%*= &''4A

CA D@"#**:"=A

(A "#  ./// ?+#" $   ##"&,'''<A?**")*)*?<*"$)A

4A ))*"D*A(' !<#)*":D)+*<# *)$*E*""$"1'6"8*<*)) ##"$"$ =<$"$"!/FGHF<:4!4''C   !*9#)A"$)*E*)I$A#$#"*J K":9*#*:"$*"$=**)" "$:$7=K9)):#*<*#)+"#" *"$7K)*I*")$**A/#$# ** )  * $$#* $#$$   K =K * K 5"!  =<$"$"))*#*8:D "+"$+=A#$#"#*#@ " )+! : * 6*!  :  "$ :$ * D+)) " :$*$9)$"$*L*A%1&!%'4*%'3KA    I<<8J $"*J       /@+ M N   

)<#")$*E***<$9)**?,<<<$"$" *$)=:)I<<





2%0132&''4