Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/582/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/582/2007 Généré par l'IA

Successor in Interest Not Bound by Prior Judgment Against Predecessor

Numéro de cause ATAS/582/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute where a party sought to enforce a right allegedly established by a prior final judgment against a successor in interest to a property involved in that judgment, arguing that the successor was bound by the prior ruling regarding a certain right or status. The court reasoned that the successor, who acquired the interest after the final judgment, was not a party to the original action and was therefore not bound by the prior determination regarding the specific right asserted, concluding that there was no legal basis to impose the prior judgment's effect on the subsequent owner of the property interest.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Successor in Interest Not Bound by Prior Judgment Against Predecessor: The court reasoned that the successor, who acquired the interest after the final judgment, was not a party to the original action and was therefore not bound by the prior determination regarding the specific right asserted, concluding that there was no legal basis to impose the prior judgment's effect on the subsequent owner of the property interest.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit à la propriété droit des successions effets de l'arrêt statut juridique revirement de jurisprudence objet du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of court costs for the appeal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2140/2003
Successor Liability Claim Rejected Based on Prior Unrelated Judgment
A/28/2006
Prior Judgment Bars Subsequent Property Dispute
A/3643/2006
Property Rights Dispute and Preclusion Analysis
A/1417/2003
Res Judicata Barring Subsequent Property Dispute Litigation
C/3229/2014
Estate Succession Dispute Over Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs for the appeal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           &'()*&+((, -&,)+&+((.

-

 -/ -     /

01"  2 % ) 1 +((.        !!!"#$ %&'("'!  & &'  !!)"'*'& + &!     '&    ,   -- -.' !/0""&!1 !'!" -'&23#,   %&'("'!  !! )"'*'&- ,41 

       !   "  ! # $% % 

  19591  

%  3 4%"'"(!'!$!';;& ';8%'<&9332=

 %& "!!   9> ?(!& 933:  ,   -- - @!1%&/ )&&A!B!(&'%&''!  6;"<&9332=

%&"!! & %% !'! >?!933:)&&%&'!' "0! #)!'"&"C)!!C''C !(!'"'"''!';8 &933:!'%6;"<&9332=

%&?0';3 ' <&933> &!<"&?'"& &=

)!'"&""% "& && !'!!'&'!B%&/ &!<B""&=

%&&&D'99B"(&!&933E + !"&"C)!)"'!'%% !<&'!& 0&" (&!<%&"% "&'C)!';;&933200&("%& !;8%'<&9332? !'%&F.%' '  0!  & & &'=C) %"')!'&'!  B &)$%&'!!%& "!&=C)!/ &"?0' &!<"!!C"!!  & %% !'! '&( ."#)&&=C)!%&!& "!1!# (&&#& &' 9):33B&G#'!'&"%% &)!'B""&' !(!'" &!<"#''&&"% &'%& "&%&!/& !'=

'' C  & &' C! <'!' 0!    & !' #  "% # '!'&  %&'!!%'! #B&!'#$ ( '=

 &!<"B!$"%B '!  <&)"&!'&)! ')')!'&'! =

))%/!& 'B!$"#;)333B&G=

  5-/6  -/ -     /

  ,   -- -# (&& #  & &'  !!'" ;)333B&G#'!'&"%G

0&BB!/&  &"!'     &!1 ! 4  &!, 

 %! B &%&"'&&D'' '!B!"$%&'!!!CH#HBB!B""& '"%<!C%&0&BB



563785933: