Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/578/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/578/2006 Généré par l'IA

Expert Testimony Admissibility in Property Valuation Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/578/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the admission of testimony from an expert witness, arguing that the expert's opinions were insufficiently supported by the record and based on speculation, particularly regarding the value of a particular asset in a property dispute. The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony because the expert, while relying on assumptions, provided a methodology linking those assumptions to the ultimate valuation, and the opposing party had adequate opportunity during cross-examination to challenge the basis and reliability of the expert's conclusions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Expert Testimony Admissibility in Property Valuation Dispute: The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony because the expert, while relying on assumptions, provided a methodology linking those assumptions to the ultimate valuation, and the opposing party had adequate opportunity during cross-examination to challenge the basis and reliability of the expert's conclusions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
témoin-expert valeur litigieuse dépositions des parties estimation des actifs contrat d'expertise spéculation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1552/2003
Admissibility of Expert Financial Testimony Upheld
A/1516/2001
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge Affirmed
A/1871/2006
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge
A/2983/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges
A/2201/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility in Commercial Contract Interpretation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                

 !

"  #"$% &$'$% ! " $&! '& %!

&()     *  



 !"#$ %!&'(( $ )*+,-./0,   



$

11     2 %%  3  !( $:* 456!7$+/8!./..   .9

       

   3/"93  

;<((=;<($'$7$; $$(>2??$$$(2 %(7 &(*.7$:& /008 >  ( *$$ '4* @ 2  7 $$ ( 277$ $ ' (*!$>277$:7$$2*A$(2AA'$(2*$$($*> 27?$2&=$(2'$A$72 ;  (*77$(/.:/00,*$*!(2($7$!*$ ( '4* @ 2  7 $$ :7*:$! 2?? *$$ '$* @ 7( $$:(2$$>2=A$7'$A>$(2AA'$( 2*$$($*'*$*/008;  27$2??$':7$( $:$$ %7'(*$:$!$::$>$($&??$?&7! '*:7*:$(2B7$!$2477$7;  !7!(*7$*$*?B*@800?-  2'$(2$*$(!>:$$:@7*(;  CCC



".,0/"0, /  39"93    &! +' , %!  #"$% &$'$% ! " $&! '& %!

 -..   /

0.1)) 2 -3  4 %'56

.-  $ @ 2 11       2 %%  3   (  >(*77$(/.:/00,$*$('4*@ 2 7$$:7*:$>$(2AA'$(2*$$( $*'*$*/008;

/- <4(:$$>(&-

9-  $ @ 2 11       2 %%  3   (  >2':$$(800?-$@$$((*7-

+- <4(:$$>(&-

8- 77$(<$-80 !?:7$(><7'$?: $7*$D$((*(90=(E$?$77 ::(*(* &?*(*(!%)FG)?>,!,00+   !$B:7-(*7$D$7A*-:*:($H I(>B$:$>(*$(*&$$7( (*$$>*;&IB77>:$?$:7'(:($$ $(*;I7$A$(7*$$-%:*: $$ 7  $ **:$ *:**  $$ I &I $ I 3(!  &?*(*(77$:$E>< ('(*'&-:*:(:$:4 ( 7'! > $ =$!  >  (* $$>* $ <'77 ( >*$*B7*(*$J$-.9/!.0,$.0KI-   H &&H     ?? *($

 7 ?: ( 7*$ D$ $ $?* B 7$ $ @ 2?? ?*(* ( 7A??





".,0/"0, 9