ATAS/574/2006 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/574/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/574/2006 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Legislation Despite Procedural Defect in Passage

Numéro de cause ATAS/574/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-06-14

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed whether a particular legislative enactment was invalid due to a procedural defect in its passage, specifically concerning the requirement for a roll-call vote and proper entry in the official journal. The court reasoned that while the Constitution mandates a roll-call vote and journal entry for certain types of legislation, which this enactment was, the failure to comply with these formal requirements does not automatically void the law where there is clear evidence that the requisite majority actually voted in favor of the bill, thus upholding the validity of the challenged enactment based on substantial compliance and the clear intent of the legislature.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Legislation Despite Procedural Defect in Passage: The court reasoned that while the Constitution mandates a roll-call vote and journal entry for certain types of legislation, which this enactment was, the failure to comply with these formal requirements does not automatically void the law where there is clear evidence that the requisite majority actually voted in favor of the bill, thus upholding the validity of the challenged enactment based on substantial compliance and the clear intent of the legislature.