Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/569/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/569/2014 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Unlawful Administrative Act Based on Incorrect Factual Assessment of Service Time for Allowances

Numéro de cause ATAS/569/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant, challenging a previous judgment, argued that a certain administrative act, which determined the payment of certain allowances, was unlawful because it was based on an incorrect factual assessment of the time spent performing the disputed activity. The court rejected this appeal, affirming the lower court's decision by finding that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assessment of the facts or the application of the relevant legal provisions, specifically concerning the calculation of service time for the allowances, contained any manifest error that would justify judicial review and annulment of the administrative act.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Unlawful Administrative Act Based on Incorrect Factual Assessment of Service Time for Allowances: The court rejected this appeal, affirming the lower court's decision by finding that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assessment of the facts or the application of the relevant legal provisions, specifically concerning the calculation of service time for the allowances, contained any manifest error that would justify judicial review and annulment of the administrative act.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
erreur administrative contrôle juridictionnel erreur de fait appréciation manifestement inexacte erreur de calcul travail supplémentaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF

The appeal was rejected based on this article.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2227/2013

### [ATAS/569/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970122) du 30.04.2014 ( PC ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0005/ATAS_000569_2014_A_2227_2013.pdf)

* /