Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/553/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/553/2005 Généré par l'IA

Statute Vagueness Challenge and Due Process Compliance

Numéro de cause ATAS/553/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a challenge to the validity of a statute, where the appellant argued that the legislation was unconstitutional because it violated the right to due process by being void for vagueness, citing several prior decisions that allegedly established controlling interpretations of the statute's key terms which the current application failed to adhere to. The court reasoned that the prior interpretations, while perhaps suggestive, did not create an unconstitutional bar to the current application of the statute; the challenged provision was sufficiently clear to give notice of the conduct it proscribed, and the statutory language, when construed consistently with the relevant case law, provided an ascertainable standard for enforcement, thus satisfying due process requirements.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute Vagueness Challenge and Due Process Compliance: The court reasoned that the prior interpretations, while perhaps suggestive, did not create an unconstitutional bar to the current application of the statute; the challenged provision was sufficiently clear to give notice of the conduct it proscribed, and the statutory language, when construed consistently with the relevant case law, provided an ascertainable standard for enforcement, thus satisfying due process requirements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
requête en autorisation d'exécution - Décision prétention légale antécédents condition de validité exception d'inconstitutionnalité interprétation du droit

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1637/2003
Statutory Validity and Vagueness Challenge
A/1820/2002
Statutory Vagueness and Due Process Challenge to Asset Acquisition Charge
A/3120/2006
Statutory Vagueness Challenge to Regulatory Statute
A/2641/2004
Statutory Validity Challenge Upheld Against Vagueness and Notice Claims
A/893/2004
Statute and Regulation Challenge Based on Free Speech and Due Process

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&'#())( #'#())*

 + +

  +, ++,  +  ,

-  ( ! ($ ! ())*        !"#$%&'!($)$(*) )   $"     )    ++     , --    ! )#$ "#$"./0%&' 

              !"

   86158  

"26'6776!$(!(&"9

($"$')("(:)"6()#;6775! "<)))")"8%9

<=()#)"()"$"< "0'677>!?#) ?"))())9

<""#()("()"23@677>9

))" A<% ))  <   ()$ " ))   " ) " 3 #677>##(()%"$"0'677>!)"<))"(") ()"<=())B8(.B)A%'')"""$ (()9

))" A<=)#"<)C23"D'($""#))' E F!  ($" () :) (" A  ) "$(" "  ) "< A)")'!($"#))'(")"'))))$! @A<%")A)9

<  @)? " ("   " <))) "  "$  (() " < !'"'!$B$)C

GGG

   . ,  +, ++,  +  ,

!

/0121   3  411 1  5" $6( ,78

2C -(" ,)  (() " <)C 23  ! @A<% ")  "  ($"(()(")"')< C

6C $')"($"C

5C ?#  () "  A< (') ?#  )  ($) :) "  "$ " 27 @ "&  )?) ( ( ##"$ "$  ; ?$"$ " ! -BHIB?A J! J773   !  ) =#(C  "$  () :) (D$C  #$# ")K F "A =)#) A "$  ) "$ ;)   ) ( "  "$))A$9;F=((A#)?)#('"#"))



1234516776  85158   )"$9F()D)"($))C-#$#  ))  ) $$#) $#$$  )) F ;F ) F 8"!  ;?$"$"(()#)&A< "'"$';C#$#"#)#. " ('! A ) @)!  A  "$ ))A$ ) <'(( " A$)$=($"$)E)C256!27J)274FC



  D??  $")K              - ;-   







(?#"($):)))?$=()A<%<???$"$ "(D??





1234516776