Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/542/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/542/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/542/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the validity of certain contractual clauses and the calculation of damages related to past transactions, where one party alleged that the other breached contractual obligations and sought restitution or damages based on misapplication of rates or fees over several years. The court reasoned that the relevant contractual language was clear, and the application of the specified rates and calculation methods by the defendant was consistent with the terms agreed upon by the parties, thus affirming the defendant's actions and rejecting the claims for recalculation or damages, while also addressing the application of specific statutory limitations on the time period for which claims could be brought.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant contractual language was clear, and the application of the specified rates and calculation methods by the defendant was consistent with the terms agreed upon by the parties, thus affirming the defendant's actions and rejecting the claims for recalculation or damages, while also addressing the application of specific statutory limitations on the time period for which claims could be brought.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels interprétation de l'arrêt validité de clause compromissoire mode de calcul droit des obligations contrat commercial

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the court fees.
Généré par l'IA
A/93/2005
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute Affirmed
A/1806/2002
Contract Abatement Clause Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute
A/1214/2004
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation in Performance Dispute
A/2440/2004
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation Appeal
A/2056/2004
Contract Termination and Damages Calculation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               &'()*&)+ &,-)&)+

 

"  #" .  " . .

./ ! + % ') 0% )+ 



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$% &   ' &"$() ) *%)##$+%)##,)  

)

--     + &&    " )$% #./0"1234   

              ! "# $%

   72587  

 1

19  #) # 8 $ 2334"  !!!!!!!!!!  #%(%  #$# # ())#+7*#)%9

29 +:: ) # +7*#)% ;7(< + =  >?%   !!!!!!!!!!" (.>) ) (.>)>%() @ *." #+::)  A() (.>)BB:)+CD)#+(()#)%#0D233E9

49 +   :%  # A()    !!!!!!!!!!" (.>)" B  %#?%(()43*$C233E9

89 &C##A<$(()#+A()"+ #"10:%*2336" #%#:#())9

E9 21$2336"+ F#$##+)D#BB+%*) #%(%1E$2336(<#*#+)D#B### +(():$%()#1E)24$2336)#%#:# ())9

69 #%#13*2336"+ D)%BG)#+)D#B $):B>#+C)?##(%##+(()%)) ($:)C$)(:CBB#*):D)9

09 )#)%#28$2336"()%$G$D"+%))#% # +  # 13 * 2336" ):%  11 * 2336" D))  BG) #+)D#B9

H9  ( #   %)% $$B% @ +   2/ $ 2336 )   ?#%@D?9

  

19  ) # )9 40 9 8 #     () ?%% # #) #  #6)C2333; =)2091#)*@I::) ##23()$C2332; &="I)?))#I D#B)#%#$#((%##*) I::B)IA?)9

29 :$%$)@I)91/94#<?$)#IA%)#)*@I:: ) #   # 24 $ 233E ; &="  : # I) D#B () G) ))B% (  * #  (< # C )#9



51/2352336  74587  

49 &+)96391 "#)G)#%(%#))D*) ):)##%D))@9

89  $G$" @ ) # +)9 20   &"  #%  (()" )  )B*#+(()+)(*)"(*):+CD)#+  (< # C ) #  " #  #% # 43 D@()#):)9

E9 +)9 4H   (%*) B   #%" $()% ( D  ( $" #) G) $$B%A()"$$@#$#$$) ;9 1= ) B  #%  D   $ :A% (    ( +))%  )(#0D*)JB0D(<JB*$);98=" )2336#/24**$)9

69 %)#*)G)$()##D##%@+"@  #" @  )   @  (%)) #($)B    ;)9 4/ 9 1  =9     (%# #$))* ; = ) $@ B)(##%;)910 )H/ =9

09 &   " +%*%$) B :)   #% ; K  ):) #  #% # : # +) D#B= () )* (#)  #% #  ( # #%" # ) B  #% #  $$ @   ($DB):#(##%9($)$(" :)#%)$:##%@()#D#$$)##%  (()9D))$C#D#(%%; - 14143E#98L -141418#9896=9

H9  (() # +)9 02  " +))% #  ()"  )) (%C" (  #% $$$) $)*%" %)   $:)$)*C9

/9 +(<"#%#:#+)D#B#+ #13*2336 %)%$$B%#)11*23369#%#B *)@%>%11$)(?%#12D(#)AD# (%%"B()#D##%24$23369

()%28$2336)#<)#:)#)G)#%%*C9



51/2352336  78587  



 . 1   #" .  " . .

%

234   5  6   78 '+) $9

19 %*C9

29 )B(%#)?))9

49 :$  () #  BI (*) :$  )  (%) G) #  #% # 43 D #<  ):) ( ( $$#% #%  C :%#% # " &>MN>:B 6" 6338   "  ) A$(9  #%  () G) (?%9  $%$ #)K = #B A)$)B#%)#%C))(##% ))B%L C= A( ( B $):  )$ (* #$# )) ) #%L = ()  ?)   #  (%))9 &  $%$  )) (  ) %%$) %$%%  )) = C= ) = 7#"  C:%#%#(()$)<BI #*#%*C9$%$#$)$. # (*" B ) D)"  B  #% ))B% ) I*(( # B%)%A(%#%);)9142"136)13H=9  ?::<  (%#)   .& %    ?::<7D)K   )>    

(:$#(%)G))):%A()BI@I:::%#% #(?::



51/2352336