Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/54/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/54/2008 Généré par l'IA

Assignment Consent Dispute Regarding Reasonable Withholding

Numéro de cause ATAS/54/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a party had satisfied a contractual condition requiring them to obtain consent for an assignment of a lease, where the lease stipulated that consent would not be unreasonably withheld. The court found that the requesting party had provided sufficient information regarding the proposed assignee to allow the landlord to reasonably determine whether to grant consent, and that the landlord's ultimate refusal, based on an unstated, subjective business concern that was not disclosed or supported by evidence showing an adverse impact on the landlord's interest, constituted an unreasonable withholding of consent under the lease terms, thereby permitting the assignment to proceed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Assignment Consent Dispute Regarding Reasonable Withholding: The court found that the requesting party had provided sufficient information regarding the proposed assignee to allow the landlord to reasonably determine whether to grant consent, and that the landlord's ultimate refusal, based on an unstated, subjective business concern that was not disclosed or supported by evidence showing an adverse impact on the landlord's interest, constituted an unreasonable withholding of consent under the lease terms, thereby permitting the assignment to proceed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
bail commercial cessionnaire pourparlers demandes de renseignements contrat possessoire validité de la résiliation de bail

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



            !""#$$!  %&#$$'

((

)* (+,*- - - ) *(- +

./   01 2 #$$' 



 !"#$  "%& & '#&!!"(#&!!)&*%% 





&

    ! !+ ,-./   0 &"#



                

   4.124  

  !#  %%& !  "&5 !(4"! %    6%&"7.//3 

&8&#%,,&7.//3&&&!# 

#%!3!#"7.//3 

 89"&! 7!#!.,8.//:; :/.1.//:<!"&&& &8&#%"&5!(4!&&%&&%  *9  % (4!&  ! "=" %&& >  > ! (4"!!%#&%#!?

&&!>89"&&&#@?

 %  ! ,6 !#"7 .//:   "!& ! &  %!&  %&!&&!!#9&"&$9?

(%!>#&&8&#&("!"&@ >(7&9!&(4!&?

('&!(%!&&!A!B 



123--1.//3  42124  

(  3 +4  (+,*- - - ) *(- +

,C !&!&&!C

.C A!BC

2C @"  %& !  >D %'& @"  &  %#& =& !  !# ! 2/ 8 !5  &@& %5 ! 7 @#!# ;*EF*@>3 3//G  < %'!"&5!!& %7 @"#"&H&C6.!@#!# 7@#!#!,: 8 .//+ ; I<?  "#" !  !& !>    "&@ & "A!%'&%&9&!&!"!&?!& =& !#  7 @#!# % ' %&  % ' #&> H !& ! (&C G.  IC  %#& =& &  %5  % ! & '>#"""A!%' !'&=&8&$('C

 9@@5  #!&K         9&& J L  L #&48&K J4 M

%@"!%#&=&&&@#H%&%9@@



123--1.//3