Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/54/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/54/2006 Généré par l'IA

Attorney's Fees Calculation in Construction Contract Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/54/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The initial appeal concerned the proper calculation of attorney's fees awarded to the prevailing party, specifically regarding whether certain costs were recoverable, given a dispute over the applicability of a state statute governing fee awards in cases involving construction contracts, which provided a mandatory award unless the court made specific findings. The court reasoned that the mandatory fee provision of the cited statute did apply to the case as it involved a contract dispute arising from construction work, and the trial court erred by failing to make the required specific statutory findings to avoid the mandatory award, thereby necessitating a remand for recalculation or justification of the fee award.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Attorney's Fees Calculation in Construction Contract Dispute: The court reasoned that the mandatory fee provision of the cited statute did apply to the case as it involved a contract dispute arising from construction work, and the trial court erred by failing to make the required specific statutory findings to avoid the mandatory award, thereby necessitating a remand for recalculation or justification of the fee award.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dépens de mandataire professionnel contrat de construction calcul des frais fixation de l'émolument honoraires d'architecte mise à la charge des frais

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to impose the costs of the federal court proceedings on the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/24/2008
Contract Dispute Statutory Attorney's Fees Award Procedure
C/3249/2013
Contractor Payment Dispute and Procedural Errors in Supplementary Work Claims
C/2197/2015
Attorney Fee Dispute and Contract Interpretation
C/23710/2018
Architect Fee Dispute and Cost Escalation Liability
P/17472/2012
Appeal Regarding Calculation of Defense Attorney's Fees

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to impose the costs of the federal court proceedings on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                 



! "#! $%  !$ %$"

$&'(   )  *+  



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$%& '"$()* ) %)##$+%)##,)    #





)

      + --    " )$% #./0"()123"4244   45



    

   92619  



)  , -)(#%#23):2773";<<)#;9 *#)% =9(>? ; @  <$%  !!!!!!!!!! A  ) )> #;*#)%A%))*%BA;)%#)&A)#)#>($ B##C>$$*))<)D

 ;  ;) <#%   C() (.E)A # (  ) )#( #   =9(>?  @  40 ()$: 2775  A;%(%))()%#)*#;$F7G"(%)))< A;*#)#)$()#)))$)A"A(()# *#%#())(<#; %):8):2773A) &)C#;*#)%#18GD

; )%;<<)(<&%*)(()D

 ( #% #)  (() # / #%$: 2773" ;   B)%  AH)#;%%):$)#;<<)(<D

;%"(%)%(,) #   ")B)%44B* 2778)#)#%))%)))#;<<)(<D

;IA#%#23):2773()$(>) $(%#(()#;C()(.E)A%):( D

;(E&; #;*))$)$#(##%);))) $)A#)<<)#);C)*)%)%#J$)))%( D



$      -)   I*  ;I) B# =@  %)% $#<%)))%"#>4J)2775" :)#" $(% # 3 BI" #)  (%#) )  *9(%#)" 3 ((%) ) 48 BI =)K4)K)38 @D

)&;)#;%)#48BI"( :<%#% 20B*2771= 457478@"# I*#()%"45<%*" #()))I)($))) :)# # %I   & ) BI ))" " # ;))) # ;%) # *CBID

 <$%$) & +)K 38  K 4 )K  EK 2 "  : ) # ,))A#)))(%* &;)38 #   <%#%   () I%% # #) #   # 8 ):



642462778  95619   2777 = @ A ) )* &   <%#%  ;9*#)% # 4/ B 4/3/D

$(%)(BI##;(>)%):D

;C)$#;)K/0#<%#%;9*)**)# 27 #%$: 4/18 = -@"   # $() () #  #% (%* A;%*);(#;<<)(<"$H$#%() ())(%D

;(";)K33K2&1#<%#%#27#%$:4/8F(%# #$))*= @)((:D

B(#)*&;)K33 )&;)K/0K2 -"((: ( I & ;9*#)%"  .   #;C$   $)<  <* # ;C%) $$%#) #  #% ) ( # (# A C A (*) H) *A%()))D

  BI  <#  ;%)) # <) ) A; %) # #"  <<) # I*)I)((%$)D

 #  (% # )%H)  <*  ) ;C%) $$%#)"  (()*  ; #  (%# (( (*) %I$) *  $()D

;#*)))<H)#%%#))$:IL)%= 4//4"(K327@D

;;(>(%*;#)I<####(%# #+(()(%))$<)$)(#I%#))#<<)(H) (#%)<*#)D

AA;)"()";)%H)#;#$))((,) I%%$)(%(#%)D

   ) ;:)) ( I # "  ) & # A  (%#  )))#())*%&))%*><)D

;)%H)#;#$));$()#;%= 44/270D473 28/@D

;B)<#>(#%):;<<)(<D

#%#)(()#/#%$:2773#)H)<$%D





642462778  91619  



 $ .%"/  "#! $%  !$ %$"

)

01 , '' 2 3 4    35 6  36  7

 3 , '

4K %*:K

) , 

2K B))K

5K )A;;)((M#;%$$)K

1K <$  () #  A; (*) <$  )  (%) H) #  #% # 57 B #>  )<) ( ( $$#% #%  : <%#% # " -ENOE<A 8" 8771   "  ) C$(K  #%  () H) (I%K  $%$ #)? @ #A C)$)A#%)#%:))(##% ))A%D :@ C( ( A $)<  )$ (* #$# )) ) #%D @ ()  I)   #  (%))K -  $%$  ))  ) %%$) %$%%  )) @ :@ ) @ 9#"  : <%#% #   ( ( )  $)>    A; #* #% *:K  $%$ #  $)   $. # (*"A)B)"A#%))A%);*((#A %)%C(%#%)=)K452"478)47F@K I<<>  %#)         9  P Q      (<$#(%)H)))<%C()A;&;<<<%#% #(I<<



642462778