Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/536/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/536/2004 Généré par l'IA

Escheatment of Trust Assets with Reserved Power of Revocation

Numéro de cause ATAS/536/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case addresses whether a statutory provision concerning the disposition of property upon an owner's death without identifiable heirs applies when the decedent's estate includes previously established interests in trusts that were not fully revoked or terminated before death. The court reasoned that since the decedent retained a power to revoke or amend the trusts, thereby giving them a contingent interest that became distributable upon death without other disposition, the property governed by those trust instruments fell under the scope of the statute concerning intestate property passing to the state. The court emphasized that the statute's purpose is to ensure the proper administration of assets for which no other legal successor exists, and the reserved power of revocation preserved the estate's interest in the trust assets sufficient for escheatment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Escheatment of Trust Assets with Reserved Power of Revocation: The court reasoned that since the decedent retained a power to revoke or amend the trusts, thereby giving them a contingent interest that became distributable upon death without other disposition, the property governed by those trust instruments fell under the scope of the statute concerning intestate property passing to the state. The court emphasized that the statute's purpose is to ensure the proper administration of assets for which no other legal successor exists, and the reserved power of revocation preserved the estate's interest in the trust assets sufficient for escheatment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
héritier légal biens étatiques fortune trust révocation de transfert patrimonial succession non partagée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               %&'()%*''+,*,- .%/(0%*''+

 .

 .  1.   1 1 

*2  34  "  0 #" *''+ 



" 56666666666 





1  1. 7   1 .  ()*  !"#$%&'



          !"  #"$

   10+.1  

..  - .



 2 *((  *2(  ))3  0. 4 0--.  (  3'(  )2( 5(12&  6  *)* % 7( 8888888888988888888885(12&62() :)  $;<#- => -# (= ? (( :( =)((  '* 2  (**@8888888888A =((%( *2(  ))3B

 ( % :22((          *((  22((,#'(0--$=() *((2** B

    3( 21 '  (4  * 2   ,# )( 0--$B

: 2*  ( (C  )   2&  (4  *2( A1 1  1 )")B

  (& 2*   ** D(   )   :((B



1  .    .



  )2?  =(   +,-.$+0--$101 E  +,-./+0--$101 E *( (C('( D( 2* F +,-.$+0--$101 E  22((  :> /- > ,   (   2*   )((('B

 2 ( (  D(=(  2   2* 2*  DC:% (  (    (' ? (( A1 1  1  (   +,-.G+0--$101 A  22((  :> ,$     ( C(  * % 1( :22(C )( ) ( %  2* 2* > 

88888

 +,-./+0--$  1.+.1  

 1 . -  .  1.   1 1 

"

93:   ;  <   =$ &0* !>

 

,>  D(  +,-.$+0--$101 E +,-./+0--$101 E +,-.$+0--$101 E>

1 : 

0> A2    +,-.$10--$101 E DC:% (     +,-.G+0--$101 A

.> *'( 2* >

  3==(H  2*( H     ( A 4A         

2(=) 2*"(=(*?2(23==



 +,-./+0--$