Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/523/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/523/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Payment Obligation Despite Item Substitution

Numéro de cause ATAS/523/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned whether an agreement's specific provision, which dictated the payment terms for certain items upon the occurrence of a particular event, applied to a transaction that involved a substitution of those items with others under a separate agreement. The court reasoned that the payment provision was triggered by the *occurrence* of the defined event, irrespective of the subsequent contractual substitution, thus upholding the original payment obligation because the triggering event had definitively happened.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Payment Obligation Despite Item Substitution: The court reasoned that the payment provision was triggered by the *occurrence* of the defined event, irrespective of the subsequent contractual substitution, thus upholding the original payment obligation because the triggering event had definitively happened.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
substitution de débiteur trafic des paiements accords particuliers inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle vendeur partie au contrat marché différentiel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was unsuccessful.
Généré par l'IA
A/2111/2006
Contractual Compensation Dispute Over Amended Payment Terms
A/1291/2004
Contractual Payment Obligation Dispute and Set-Off Interpretation
A/1118/2005
Contractual Payment Entitlement Dispute
A/3653/2006
Contractual Payment Obligation Dispute
A/3026/2005
Contractual Payment Dispute Interpretation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was unsuccessful.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%%%#&''& #(&)#&''*

!!

+ !,+ -  +! -,

 $ " &''* ).  /0 1 



 !!!!!!!!!! "



"

!2, -  -,- 3 ,, " "23 # $%&'()"*+,(-.--/0.1



                ! "

   6.4'6  

""#7"8)#3#-9:".,,.( ";0 #2)"<6)/  =7>32""#"" ?6 6 6 #) !!!!!!!!!!)@3.,,,A7B',,(9,C

 ) #3 # 2%2 :(  ?0 " #@" 72 <? D=)7>32""#"E")>" 72#)2%2)3#A7B-.,B6C

  *, F" .,,.(     #  0 #3 " " 2)G"  )33#" " 7>"  2"" # "" # ) @3 .,,,A7B.@.''B6C

 ) #3 # 2%2 :(  ? D  7>3 )  )"  2"" # "E")>"72A7B+.-B6C

 )  # .& )"2E .,,.( @3  ":"3  "  #3C

):;2"#.10.,,'( E"#:"3 2"/#"" ?6 6 6 C

:;2"""37C





#3"#"8"#..02E-1'-@;" :#3"32#73"""3#/-F".,,* E"# C

7232"A@"B*B*##)"""("#" 0"@"30;#")#"#0" 22"#   2"/ #H" 72 " 3"3 "2 #@77  E " #   """  " 8 <"B &+ B . "B  =C

  2)3" # E # 3 "  3"E ) :; #  #@)/C

 E""8(":"3"2)"<"B*9B-#  " # - 2 -11+   " I DJ=( " 0E   72C

 4-5554.,,.   6*4'6   @>"2#@"B.5B- D(02A"E"#)"# 0#"72"2%288"#E# "" )"    73#3 # ., #32E -1'+  @6 0"00"< ?=C

@ 38(  0" 3;2" # :"    2"/ #@"72C

 4-5554.,,.   6'4'6  

!  -,3  !,+ -  +! -,



4/5   6  7   89 $:& -;

  5 K

-B ""8"0EC

 5

.B :""C

*B "8)3#";""B    ;77/K  3#"K   DD ?            

)72#)3"%"""73>)"8@A@7773#3 #);77

 4-5554.,,.