Restrictive Covenant Violation Regarding Structural Alteration
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe case involves a dispute over the scope of a restrictive covenant in a property deed, specifically concerning whether an alteration to a structure violated the covenant that generally prohibited structural modifications without written consent. The court reasoned that the specific restriction at issue referred only to "erecting" new structures, and the work performed constituted an alteration or repair to an existing structure, not a new erection, thus concluding that the property owner did not breach the covenant by failing to obtain prior written consent for the changes made.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IARestrictive Covenant Violation Regarding Structural Alteration: The court reasoned that the specific restriction at issue referred only to "erecting" new structures, and the work performed constituted an alteration or repair to an existing structure, not a new erection, thus concluding that the property owner did not breach the covenant by failing to obtain prior written consent for the changes made.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
#$#%&&' #(%%#%&&'
""
) ") ! )"! !
!* + '
%, %&&'
!"#$%&$'!!'' #!#$ (&$)$#* +,!#
!$#
,, ( -#!"#&$'! #!$ '$'& .#'/0 "!$122 31334%12
!" "
81518 9'$&''!#!""!'$'!(99'$!("!':'8"#4;( < =6!%>#166?@
#!# #"#&$& "# ,!# * + 1 A%'#1667!$#&''!"#&'$& #-'$#&!B 5351667@
#&"!( 1/A%'#1667@
(##C$ ''$ #'> $! # !' 7 9&%#'# 1667 "#!!D$"'!('$@
&''!'EF-+ 1/9&%#'#1667$7 !$!>#166?@
#"#'"#!/%#'1667@
!##'# #!#$ 36 ' 1667 "# G &# #$'## ! #!#@
$$#!'$G!(#$H20H3!'#"#!&#''$#$'%31 "$>#302?: < #$#'$#!#$9'I"#!&#@
" ! - ") ! )"! !
./010 2 300 0 45 $'% 6
3H #$#$#'$#!#H
1H .#FH
=H '$G"#!&#$-#$'$H -#99'4# #&'$ .+ &#'
!"'!9!#"#&$##C$$!$'9'&J"#$'"#-#99
5351667