Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/516/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/516/2006 Généré par l'IA

Governmental Entity v. Surety: Breach of Performance Bond Liability

Numéro de cause ATAS/516/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The plaintiff, a governmental entity, sued the defendant for breach of contract related to a performance bond guarantee following the defendant's failure to complete a public works project; the court reasoned that the language of the bond, which did not contain a specific clause requiring written notice of default for liability to attach, meant that the defendant was liable upon the project owner's formal declaration of default, which occurred prior to the defendant's subsequent purported cure attempt, thereby validating the governmental entity's claim against the surety.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Governmental Entity v. Surety: Breach of Performance Bond Liability: The plaintiff, a governmental entity, sued the defendant for breach of contract related to a performance bond guarantee following the defendant's failure to complete a public works project; the court reasoned that the language of the bond, which did not contain a specific clause requiring written notice of default for liability to attach, meant that the defendant was liable upon the project owner's formal declaration of default, which occurred prior to the defendant's subsequent purported cure attempt, thereby validating the governmental entity's claim against the surety.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
caution promesse de porte-fort obligation responsabilité de l'entrepreneur annonces publiques obligation de prester de l'assureur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Cited in the dispositive to declare the appeal inadmissible based on procedural grounds.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               !"#$#!%&&' !#"'!%&&'

 

(  )( *  (  *)

+,- .

 $" , %&&' 



 ! " 



!" 

#$    %& "&!'(( % ! &)*+% &"&( ,!"--./%*+   -



 

           

   2+0-2  

  / 0     3&" 4!56" 4   4&" &"&! , !!(  +7 & +//8 ,   &5 ""(&    (,5&9 " "!  :)%""" (3! ;

%"" &6!&", :$ )& " '(( %("( !("" &4&"( (;

 ,  ! !  -* 6)&  +//.%  &5 ""(&   (5!"(  3& 9<"""=(&'"&!! >3!"&! "" &;

 4&"( (&" 6"( !  "*+) &+//.!" 4#!,&(( % !&&! ("&!%"$ )& $!" ,, &!5&) , ""&! $;

4  &&9( )!&  !&9(   )&  "  '((   !,&  ! ! %,!  "&3&"&!;

, ! & *-) &+//.%' 33 &5( 9&!,& (&&!!""(;

4"+?) &+//.%4&"( (&3! ( &5(9 "  '((   "&3&  , ! ! % "!"  " @ !)!9  "!"  !% <4& )5&&"(%3& "" A!=,"@;

  &5  (  &" ,(  $ )&  "  '((  3&  )!&  & 4&"( ( 3&&" "!6!  4!56" 4   4&" &"&! " &%   (A("% & !&"!!""=4"&!6"&&""(, ,,&;

7&+//.%4&"( (!&9( &5(!,&4! &    %  $ )&  "  '(( % > "  9 ""  &: %9&"("" &%4"&",!3&   ! %!"&39! "&("&"& )5!,""" &)"(%&  !B"&3!(;

4"*1&+//.% &5!&9(,&:=4#!,&(( " ("(' (=6' ;



   9 !3! (" = 4 "C 1. C + "C  %  &5 "! !&!B"%&"&9%!"""&!, () , 4 "C-7!&"! , ""&!"!! (>AD  3& !&"%*7!)5 *EE8F $G;

!,(",! 6' 4,:"&&("5&;



0*1-10+//.  2-0-2    ! "%3 ,,(4&" &"&!%"!"";

4&" &","" 6"&%3,! >   !&"" &"", ! 4 "C*E $%" !&", !&"( "C+7 $;

 !&" ! & !" (&&!$ )& $4#!,&'((  !"&", !&"" &"", !4 "C*EC+ %&&9 &5(4(6=6'(!,,!" ! "=4&"&(F3C <" $+1!"!5 +//1% $7E?0+//1G;

"" &4&"( (>, ("( (, "&3&  ! &" 6"( , ,,&%!"&394&("&"" &3"&3!(;

4&H&!(9!"" 94&"( (4,9&"(,!  ! & ;



  1*)2   )( *  (  *)

 

34/,, 5  6   78 "'% * 9

*C (  ! & )5C

+C &"9, !( "' "&"C  ' 33&   , (&"       I&    &       !,&!3! , (" <""!"&3&(>, "&"!&9(= , ' 33





0*1-10+//.