Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/497/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/497/2005 Généré par l'IA

Jurisdiction to Amend Judgment After Appellate Dismissal

Numéro de cause ATAS/497/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute concerning a prior judgment, focusing on whether the court retained jurisdiction to amend the judgment after the appellate court had dismissed an appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and whether the trial court's actions constituted a valid amendment or a prohibited collateral attack on the appellate court's mandate. The court reasoned that once the appellate court dismissed the appeal, the trial court's jurisdiction to modify the judgment was limited to corrections of clerical errors or enforcement of the mandate, and that the subsequent attempt to significantly alter the judgment effectively violated the principle of insulating appellate mandates from trial court interference, thus constituting an improper action.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Jurisdiction to Amend Judgment After Appellate Dismissal: The court reasoned that once the appellate court dismissed the appeal, the trial court's jurisdiction to modify the judgment was limited to corrections of clerical errors or enforcement of the mandate, and that the subsequent attempt to significantly alter the judgment effectively violated the principle of insulating appellate mandates from trial court interference, thus constituting an improper action.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
incompétence ratione materiae révision d'une décision modification de la demande exécution effets des arrêts préjudiciels manquement aux devoirs de magistrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/632/2007
Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment
C/28283/2007
Appeal Against Superseded Decision Mooted by Subsequent Modification
PS/15/2010
Cost Liability Interpretation and Amendment of Judgment
P/7438/2015
Revision Granted Due to Improperly Composed Appellate Court
A/2021/2007
Scope of Protective Order in Subsequent Litigation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&'#$((% #%)*#$(('

++

 + , ,  +  ,

$-  .  ! /&  $((' 



0! 1111111111 





22  ,  ,3+4 ,    '()  !"#$%&

            !"

   0+*10  

&)23 &2'$'4

'(2'22'-.5)%'+,('+//.4

3'%2'4  6 3  3 77) # )6'2  %)8' (9' 25'  :';;;;;;;;;; $(2)'%)&3''5'2(9+//. 2&6&%77(&:';;;;;;;;;;)#( <  3'%'3)'&6'((#2)< 

+   2 , + , ,  +  ,

! 3660   7

86090   :  700 0  3" &;$ ,<=

-<   # 3    77( # )6'2  %)8' (9' 25'  :' ;;;;;;;;;;   $(  2) '%)& 3'' 5'2(9+//.2<

+< 3 (69'<

1<   # :' ;;;;;;;;;;   6  77( ( 5' #  2)<

,< '62)7'<

.< 22''3<./ &'5(2'632%5( 2)=)'1/>$'5''22' (()) '95))&?8@'A856'B&B//,   &'C(2'<)'2=27)<()(''D E''6C(6)'')'9''2 )''6)49EC226('5''(2%'( )''4E2'72)<?'()(' ' 2  ' ))( )())   E 9E  E '0& 



*+,-.*+//,  01*10   '95))22('$63' %)'%9<()('('(   2%& 6'  >'& '' 6  )'' 6)  3%22  6))C2)')F<-1+&-/B-/GE<



    755'D )'D   '' 99'        

2'5(2)='5')C2'''63#355'5)) '2755





*+,-.*+//,