Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/481/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/481/2014 Généré par l'IA

Right to Information Access vs. Protection of Preliminary Administrative Negotiations

Numéro de cause ATAS/481/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged a decision related to the right to information, specifically concerning access to documents held by a public authority regarding a preliminary zoning plan modification, arguing that disclosure would prejudice the authority's decision-making process and potentially impact ongoing negotiations with third parties. The court partially admitted the appeal, reasoning that while certain procedural documents were accessible as part of the general right to information concerning administrative acts, documents revealing the substance of negotiations or internal preliminary opinions with third parties could legitimately be withheld to protect the public interest in effective administrative consultation and negotiation until a final decision was formally taken.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Right to Information Access vs. Protection of Preliminary Administrative Negotiations: The court partially admitted the appeal, reasoning that while certain procedural documents were accessible as part of the general right to information concerning administrative acts, documents revealing the substance of negotiations or internal preliminary opinions with third parties could legitimately be withheld to protect the public interest in effective administrative consultation and negotiation until a final decision was formally taken.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit d'accès aux documents protection du processus décisionnel consultation d'information communication des données protection de l'intérêt public décision préjudicielle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs of the federal court.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2658/2013

### [ATAS/481/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969726) du 08.04.2014 ( CHOMAG ) , PARTIELMNT ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0004/ATAS_000481_2014_A_2658_2013.pdf)

* /