Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/480/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/480/2014 Généré par l'IA

Bidder Challenge Regarding Manifest Errors in Public Procurement Award

Numéro de cause ATAS/480/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from an administrative decision concerning a public procurement procedure where a bidder challenged the award of a contract, arguing that the successful tenderer's bid contained manifest errors that should have led to its rejection, specifically citing a failure to correctly calculate a lump-sum price component and an accompanying explanatory note that contradicted the bid's own figures. The court ultimately determined that the discrepancy between the lump-sum calculation and the total price, combined with the contradictory explanatory note, constituted a material inconsistency that violated the principle of equal treatment of bidders, as it obscured the true scope and cost of the offer, justifying the annulment of the award decision and the remittal of the matter for re-evaluation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 107 al. 2 LTF, Art. 68 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Bidder Challenge Regarding Manifest Errors in Public Procurement Award: The court ultimately determined that the discrepancy between the lump-sum calculation and the total price, combined with the contradictory explanatory note, constituted a material inconsistency that violated the principle of equal treatment of bidders, as it obscured the true scope and cost of the offer, justifying the annulment of the award decision and the remittal of the matter for re-evaluation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
adjudication d'un marché public recours contre des décisions administratives objet du litige erreur manifeste annulation du contrat déroulement des procédures de passation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 107 al. 2 LTF
Used to admit the appeal and to quash and remit the case to the lower court for a new decision.
Art. 68 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the respondent to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/2476/2016
Appeal Sustained: Annulment of Public Contract Award Due to Bidder's Formal Defects and Procedural Errors
A/4461/2018
Bidder Challenge to Contract Award Regarding Procedural Errors Upheld
A/1108/2018
Challenger v. Awardee Regarding Contract Tender Award Due to Alleged Unjustified Price Corrections and Flawed Low-Bid Justification
A/784/2018
Annulment of Public Works Contract Award Due to Procedural and Calculation Errors
A/2125/2017
Bidder Challenge to Public Contract Award Based on Scoring Dispute Dismissed

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 107 al. 2 LTF

Used to admit the appeal and to quash and remit the case to the lower court for a new decision.

Art. 68 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the respondent to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2569/2013

### [ATAS/480/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969725) du 08.04.2014 ( PC ) , ADMIS/RENVOI

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0004/ATAS_000480_2014_A_2569_2013.pdf)

* /