Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/480/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/480/2004 Généré par l'IA

Guarantor Liability Contingent on Condition Precedent Fulfillment

Numéro de cause ATAS/480/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute concerning whether certain conditions precedent were met for the enforcement of contractual guarantees. The court reasoned that the language of the guarantee agreements, read in context with the underlying loan documents, clearly conditioned the guarantors' liability upon the occurrence of a specific triggering event, which the plaintiff failed to establish had occurred, thereby excusing the guarantors from their obligations.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Guarantor Liability Contingent on Condition Precedent Fulfillment: The court reasoned that the language of the guarantee agreements, read in context with the underlying loan documents, clearly conditioned the guarantors' liability upon the occurrence of a specific triggering event, which the plaintiff failed to establish had occurred, thereby excusing the guarantors from their obligations.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
responsabilité de la caution obligations contractuelles cas d'appel en garantie exécution droit d'emption du preneur obligation de diminuer le dommage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the final order regarding the assessment of costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/2325/2003
Guarantee Enforcement Conditional on Judgment Against Principal Debtor
A/1385/2007
Guarantee Enforcement and Continuing Liability Dispute
A/1748/2003
Contract Interpretation and Condition Precedent Dispute
A/532/2005
Breach of Contract - Conditions Precedent
A/1000/2003
Guarantor Liability for Modified Underlying Obligations

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the final order regarding the assessment of costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    "#$%%"&''( "%)'"&''%

*

 +, ++,  + ,

! &% ! &''%

(-  . 

  

/0  1!    +2222222222     ! "" # $ %$ &'# ()*(  $+$%

+%$

33 ++,  ,4+5+6, $ , -+ .' / 01 %23

       

         ! (45

%%,  7% 8 $ ,3+ , ' 731$$ (5# 977 %+ , 9$: 1,%3 ;:$0 < =  $>%3  ,2, , $%%+ ,3+3 $ ,2 ?????????? @

< ,% , 6' 731$$ (5# %% ,$0$  7+$23 ++%+ +%$ %% ,3+ @

 $ ,3+ $ ++%+ , 6. 2$ (5# <   2%  $20$ ,3+ @

 $ +$$$ , (& 1$ (5# <$3  %$>%3 $+$ +%$ %% ,3+ @

< ,% , A > (&#  $+$% % ,33,3 @

+,3$%  ,$+% 8<B %$2 , <$%C 'D %C E ,  + %+ , $+3,$ ,2%$%1 ; @ ) 6*=# <%$%+ , $+$ % , $  ,30 ,< $% @

< -   ,<%%,$  ,3%$2%+ , <+$ ,  $+$% @

46.&&4(5

  3 , +, ++,  + ,

!

78010   9  :00 0  4; #<& ,=>

: ?0 8 

6C ", <%$%+ ,   @

(C 7+$2  $% ,  8< 1% 7+$2$ $+$ +%$  $3% $$F% ,  ,3 , 6* >+$ ,0  +%7%+ $  $+22,3 ,$3  $E 73,3$ , $# "GH$+78 A# A&   #  %$+ B2$C  ,3  % F%$ $++I3C  232+$ ,+% J = ,8$ B%2% 8 ,3+  $+$% ,3$ +E%$   %  ,  ,3+ %%83@ E= B+$ +$ 8 2+%7  %2 +1+$ ,2,$ %% %$ ,3+@ = +$%$  I%$ +  , + $$3%%C "  232+$  +%%   %$+ 332% 323$3 + %%$ = E= % = :,#  $E 73,3$ , $  +$$  %$$  2%0$ $  $+$ 8< ,1$ ,3$$ $$1EC  232+$ , $+$ 2%+$ +$  2+- , $1# 8 $+% >+%#  8  ,3+ %%83 % <1+ , 8   3%3 B3,3  $+$% ;$%C 65(# 6*A % 6*D =C

 I$770$ J  $3,% J

 KK L$ " L

 + +7+$2 , $3% $$F% % +%73 B $%  89/ 977 73,3$ , $ + $  I$77

46.&&4(5