Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/477/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/477/2014 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Concerning Access to Personal Data in Allowance Payments

Numéro de cause ATAS/477/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision related to a request for access to documents concerning the calculation and payment of a monthly allowance, which the authority had initially denied based on provisions protecting the personal data of the recipients. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the contested decision, which limited disclosure to aggregated and anonymized data, was justified because the specific information requested—concerning the calculation and payment of the allowance—constituted personal data protected under relevant legislation, and the public interest in transparency did not outweigh the protection of the recipients' privacy rights regarding their individual financial details.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 97 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Concerning Access to Personal Data in Allowance Payments: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the contested decision, which limited disclosure to aggregated and anonymized data, was justified because the specific information requested—concerning the calculation and payment of the allowance—constituted personal data protected under relevant legislation, and the public interest in transparency did not outweigh the protection of the recipients' privacy rights regarding their individual financial details.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
protection des données à caractère personnel droit d'accès aux documents demandes de renseignements informations du secteur public déclaration de la situation financière allocation de ménage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 97 al. 1 LTF

The appeal is dismissed because the grounds raised do not meet the requirements for admissibility.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/3523/2013

### [ATAS/477/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969722) du 08.04.2014 ( CHOMAG ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0004/ATAS_000477_2014_A_3523_2013.pdf)

* /