Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/473/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/473/2004 Généré par l'IA

Restrictive Covenant Enforcement After Neighborhood Change

Numéro de cause ATAS/473/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought to enforce a restrictive covenant concerning the use of real property, arguing that the opposing party's commercial development violated the agreement, while the opposing party contended that the covenant had been abandoned or waived due to changes in the surrounding area and prior non-enforcement of similar uses. The court reasoned that although there had been some changes in the neighborhood, the specific covenant in question remained valid and enforceable because there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a general abandonment of the restrictions or a pattern of waiver that would render enforcement inequitable, ultimately granting the injunction against the prohibited commercial use.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Restrictive Covenant Enforcement After Neighborhood Change: The court reasoned that although there had been some changes in the neighborhood, the specific covenant in question remained valid and enforceable because there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a general abandonment of the restrictions or a pattern of waiver that would render enforcement inequitable, ultimately granting the injunction against the prohibited commercial use.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exécution conformité à la zone fortune immobilière changement d'affectation promotion immobilière modification de la servitude

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/228/2004
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Despite Neighborhood Change
A/2311/2006
Covenant Enforcement Barred by Abandonment and Changed Circumstances
A/683/2004
Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants Against Commercial Use
A/2383/2006
Restrictive Covenant Interpretation and Enforcement
A/179/2006
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&''$()$*$  $+,)$*((+



-  .- ! /  -! /! 

*0  12    %' " *((+ 



 .3333333333 !"#!$%%$$ &'(  !   ' "!



! 

!   / -  4-!  ! $!$# 4!!  5-67)!$*+,-.!!! /  $ !"#!$%%$$ &(  "! 





           ! "#

   61026  

  %#$$ %14 7#" $  1552 !  %#$$   $!$ % 3 8$ 1552 %  9 :

  !$*%$ :

 #%  )!%#/ #%,;7#" $ 1553:

<%$% !$% !$%=8$1553:

</!!$  !$%$>#.$! "$ %#! $ / #!$ %  %#$$  "  !?  !$>! $%!$> !    9  !   < :

<$  #!# " % %  <$! !$ % <77$  %< % !    !$ < !(;=!( :

< $!$ % < !( ;@   <$! !$    $     !$   %$$+!$!!/<#.#%%#$%<%* #! A!%<77$   $B(

 ! / 9   .- ! /  -! /!  

C7 #!/%$$!$! $!$ %< !(,D1E 

,( 9%<$! !$%$!$%< !(;=!( (

1( $!><$! !$   $ %%% !$%$$+!$ !!/<#.#%%#$%<%* #! A!%<77$  $B(

2( # "$!% #% (

3( 7    !$ %  >< "! 7     !    #!  A! %  %#$ % ,5 8  %*  !$7$!$   $ %# % #  $B 7#%#  %   9.F$G .7>$ D D553     ! $ ?$ (%#$!A!  +#(#$ %$!HE$%$> 



 0,123401555  62026   ?!! > %#$$   ! %#$  B!$   $ !  %  %#$$ !!>#:BE?  >!$7$!$"$ %% !!! %#$$: E ! $+! %  #!!(9$#$ !$!! $ ##!## #!! EBE!E$6% $B7#%# %      !    !$*       ><$ %"  %#   $ "B(  #$ %  !$  )% ">$ !8$!$$ >  %#$$ !!># ! <" % >   #!# ?#%$#   ! C !(,21,5D!,5=E(



  + 77$ H   #$%!H   $ $ BB$                   $7 % #! A!!!$7$#? !$$$></<77$7#%#  % $ + 77

 0,123401555