Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/470/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/470/2005 Généré par l'IA

Liquidated Damages Clause Unenforceable as Penalty Due to Disproportionate Actual Loss

Numéro de cause ATAS/470/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the assessment of damages for breach of contract, arguing that the original agreement's liquidated damages clause was an unenforceable penalty because the actual loss was significantly lower than the stipulated amount. The court reasoned that liquidated damages clauses are enforceable if they represent a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the harm caused by the breach and are not intended as a punishment; because the actual damages were minimal compared to the liquidated sum, the clause served primarily as a penalty, rendering it void as against public policy, thus requiring the non-breaching party to prove actual damages.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Liquidated Damages Clause Unenforceable as Penalty Due to Disproportionate Actual Loss: The court reasoned that liquidated damages clauses are enforceable if they represent a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the harm caused by the breach and are not intended as a punishment; because the actual damages were minimal compared to the liquidated sum, the clause served primarily as a penalty, rendering it void as against public policy, thus requiring the non-breaching party to prove actual damages.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
peine disproportionnée calcul des dommages-intérêts clause pénale violation essentielle du contrat clause punitive validité de clause compromissoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$$%&#'(() #%*(#'(()



 +, ++,  + ,

-  & ! '.  '(() 



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$%$#&% '  % 



%

()  ((  *   (+ +",-$.-%/0" %-$ 0122)  '



       

         !"

   *53/*  

+ + /

,$##%,$%$,5/7$852269

 :$  7%  % %% ,$ #; , < , $  46852269

#,40-5226"%,=$8%8$,8 %%$9

:8%,:#,%%,>,?+





3441/35226  */3/*  

  / , +, ++,  + ,

!

01232   4  522 2  6" $.' ,78

4+ ,%,%%,9

5+ >,?+      @77;  $,%B     AA ( 







#7-,#$%C%%%7$D#%=:E:777$,$ ,%$#<=#@77



3441/35226