Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/467/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/467/2014 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Public Records Access to Building Permit Documents

Numéro de cause ATAS/467/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

This case concerned an appeal against a decision that rejected a request for access to public records related to a building permit, where the requester sought documents concerning the compliance of the construction with specific zoning regulations and established legal frameworks. The court reasoned that while the principle of public access to administrative documents is fundamental, it is subject to limitations to protect legitimate interests, including the privacy of individuals and the effectiveness of administrative procedures, ultimately upholding the original decision by finding that disclosure of the requested documents, in their entirety, would improperly compromise ongoing administrative scrutiny or reveal sensitive pre-decision deliberations, thus warranting the refusal of the access request.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Denial of Public Records Access to Building Permit Documents: The court reasoned that while the principle of public access to administrative documents is fundamental, it is subject to limitations to protect legitimate interests, including the privacy of individuals and the effectiveness of administrative procedures, ultimately upholding the original decision by finding that disclosure of the requested documents, in their entirety, would improperly compromise ongoing administrative scrutiny or reveal sensitive pre-decision deliberations, thus warranting the refusal of the access request.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
accès aux documents permis de construire bâtiment public réglementation sur les zones à bâtir décision-cadre publication des plans

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal is declared inadmissible because it was filed against a non-final decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/198/2014

### [ATAS/467/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969713) du 03.04.2014 ( AI ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0004/ATAS_000467_2014_A_198_2014.pdf)

* /