Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/453/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/453/2005 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Conviction and Sentence Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/453/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal of a conviction for an offense, where the appellant contended that the evidence was insufficient and the sentence was excessive. The court reviewed the trial court's handling of the evidence, including testimony and physical evidence, and found no clear error in the admission or weighing of that evidence, concluding it supported the verdict beyond a reasonable doubt. Regarding sentencing, the court found that the imposed term fell within the authorized range and adequately addressed the seriousness of the offense and the need for deterrence, thus affirming both the conviction and the sentence.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal of Conviction and Sentence Affirmation: The court reviewed the trial court's handling of the evidence, including testimony and physical evidence, and found no clear error in the admission or weighing of that evidence, concluding it supported the verdict beyond a reasonable doubt. Regarding sentencing, the court found that the imposed term fell within the authorized range and adequately addressed the seriousness of the offense and the need for deterrence, thus affirming both the conviction and the sentence.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fixation de la peine doute raisonnable recours contre décision de renvoi plainte pénale fixation de l'amende concours réel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article is cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/301/2007
Appeal of Conviction Regarding Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Departure
P/13611/2017
Appeal of Multi-Offense Conviction and Sentence Affirmation
A/3224/2005
Criminal Conviction Affirmation on Evidentiary and Instructional Grounds
A/1270/2003
Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Criminal Appeal
A/674/2005
Affirmation of Criminal Convictions and Sentences After Review of Timeliness, Statutory Interpretation, and Evidentiary Sufficiency

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

   

                

 

         

   



!"#$ %&&&&&&&&&&  !"!#$#"!%&' !-!$ (((((((((()*+,



-$!

 '  !(    &-',,,# ,$,'# .-/,0-1234 55 

$

        !(  &-',,,#-!,3* 56 ""#  )6   7  



1,$8"!&#,,-!-""-,$,-&9'!7556 ,1#&#!& -'"$,-:,"!;,<!=$#>-""-,$,-1-!'#"!%?(((((((((( @ >-$! &  &#,,- & 77 &#'A! 755B $ -,&#!# 8 ,, +,$ C!# "!; & > $,$$ , & &!-,$ -'"!# & =+,! @ '! 755B  $,+,$#&#"&$D

 %? ((((((((((  !-! -$! $$ &#,,- ! -""-,$,-  76 +!, 7556 "!; & !,A $- & ! -,  -$ "!,,"'$@,$#$A,&,,!'$@-$,-D

E',7556 ,-!=$&!-!D

 $$&  &!-,$ 8 -1-!'#'$ @ >!$? 64 ?  ,$$?  F?  &  -, ! >-!3,$,- =&,,,! : <   !,A $- & ! -, $ -'"#$$"-!$$!&"!#$D

 >@$!&G!$?9 &-,!"!-#&!&',,$!$,+&7"$'A! HE6 : <  G$-!,$# "$  &G-11, - ! !8I$  -!&-! G""   & $,! &-$  ,$$,- =!,&,8 $ "$,A &GI$! 11$# "! G, &  "!-#&!? ,"+$C!!&!-,$8,-$-1#!#C"!$, $&#,,-!&+,$-""-AD

> G";   ,$$,- =!,&,8 & > $,$$ , & &!-,$ -'"!# $ "$,A&>I$!11$#"!G,&"!#$"!-#&!D

>,=$,1,"!-#8$&G""!> $,$$,&&!-,$-'"!# $&,1,C!&#,"-!8>,&#$!',!!-!?    



(  ! ' )         

**#*+,+*" #*

? ""> $,$$),&&!-,$-'"!#D

7? ,-'',8-",&",;&&-,!D

? ,,'"!$,$&#,7B=,7556"-!&#$!',!!!-!?         3!11,;!J  !#,&$J   * )  #!,% 

-",-1-!'&"!#$!!I$$-$,1,#C"!$,"!3!11