Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/453/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/453/2004 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract for Defective Service Delivery

Numéro de cause ATAS/453/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a defendant, under contract to perform certain services, breached that agreement by failing to include specific components in the final delivery, specifically regarding the type of heating system installed and related documentation. The court reasoned that the contractual specifications, as modified by subsequent agreements and industry standards, clearly mandated the inclusion of the specified components and documentation. Because the defendant delivered a system lacking these required elements and failed to adequately address the resulting deficiencies, the court found that a material breach of contract occurred, entitling the plaintiff to the remedies sought.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Contract for Defective Service Delivery: The court reasoned that the contractual specifications, as modified by subsequent agreements and industry standards, clearly mandated the inclusion of the specified components and documentation. Because the defendant delivered a system lacking these required elements and failed to adequately address the resulting deficiencies, the court found that a material breach of contract occurred, entitling the plaintiff to the remedies sought.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat de prestation de services défaut de la chose violation essentielle du contrat contentieux contractuel cahier des charges violation d'une obligation d'entretien

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited for the allocation of costs in the final orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               &'()*&'+,',  "&(-+&'(

 "

 "  ."   . . 

'/  01  $  2 #$ '( 



$ 3333333333 





!  . !! "#$$%& ''+, "'()*'



          ! "  #$%

   2.*02  

""  4 "

 "' 3333333333 4'2 5  6  ,  5 $  ' #' 4'2 5'6 78'('+$')+ ' '9'$:

 .11/ '++7,#'&0.;<!.%:

 $,''$-; +8.11/',+' '+$= +'$ <,#' .11/  9  #' $,  ++$+ $ )  4 '>1/-?%@1-6:

'& '''$$,'' ''--#+8 .11/<'+9 '+$<,#'.11/7#' ,, ),&A:

$$.1$,+8.11/7'$+#' ),' '+#$,(, '+$+'.11/$' 97',+, ':

 $  ,  $ -? <,#' .110  '   97' 7(' $  '+ $ <,#'.11/$+'.11/$,+ B,:

  '8 $ ,  $,  + '  $ '   ? #'.110:

$=+#9,7  ,,:

  '  '$'9, 9   7 '' , '#8   $#' C$,,'#8,(+:

7  <'+, 9  $D 8' $ #+ '< & 7, .11/  7#' ),9D:

   52#8  ,, +'    E #' .110 #  $,'  ./ #'.110 $7,#8#':

 '+' '$7'$,.-#'.110' $$,'-%+'.110 79'$ '+$<,#'.11/9 'B<'$ $ '''97B',C+':

7A$7C7#' $,'&  ''!

 *-./0%*.111  2/*02  



.  "    "

#8 #',,$, ,$<+$,' ,#  ' '(,,$$'$'4!?1 6:

9''#&#8'',$7 '' C',#$  + F $  $,''   ''  '  ,  +'5  7 $,+',<$:

7B + $ ' ?- $  ' <,$,  72+$' $ -@ + -;;@  ;1$7$$.EA'-;;%72+$'7<'B +$ '+& ) , '+, )8++:

7$2 '+$7 '+++' 'C$, ' '$<'$ 7',,:

7 7 '  $ $' 9  $D 8' $ #+ G 7,.11/79',9D:

$,+ <<, '+'$<,#'.11/,'+ ),:

   7,8'   '  7  '' 7' $ $ $ B ''',''&7'$7$'$=+#9,:

7,9' C9<'$'&$+$$':

A,!

HHHHH

 . " 4  "  ."   . . 

506   7  8   9% :)' ;<

  6 

-! ,#8!

$ 6

.! A!

 *-./0%*.111   20*02   /! $+'#,$7 ''<'++$+$ ) ' >1/-?%@1-!

0! '9 ,$('!

%! <+  ' $  97 # <+    , C $  $,' $ /1 A $5  '<''  ' ++$, $,  '8 <,$, $  IJK'DJ<9' ? ?110     ' B+ '!  $,'   C (,!  +,+' $'L 6 '$'9 B+9$,''$,'8'' $$,'' 9,: 86 B   9 +'< ' '+ #' $+$   $,'': 6   '(   $   ,! I'  +,+'  '   ' ,,+ ,+,,   6 86  6 '2$  '8<,$,$  +'597' $#$,'#8!+,+'$+'+) $ # 9'  A' '' 9  $,'' 9,  7#  $ 9,,B ,$',4!-/.-1?-1@6!  (<<'L  ,'$L     ' I 8I 

 '<+$ ,C'<',B '''97&7<<'<,$, $' (<<



 *-./0%*.111