Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/451/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/451/2005 Généré par l'IA

Plaintiff v. Defendant on Arbitration Award Enforcement

Numéro de cause ATAS/451/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The lower court erred in granting summary judgment against the plaintiff who sought to enforce an arbitration award, as the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence, including conflicting expert testimony regarding the validity of a release signed by the plaintiff, which raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the release was supported by adequate consideration and thus enforceable to preclude arbitration. The court reasoned that summary judgment is inappropriate when facts are disputed and a reasonable jury could find in favor of the non-moving party, necessitating a trial to resolve the factual dispute concerning the consideration for the release.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Plaintiff v. Defendant on Arbitration Award Enforcement: The court reasoned that summary judgment is inappropriate when facts are disputed and a reasonable jury could find in favor of the non-moving party, necessitating a trial to resolve the factual dispute concerning the consideration for the release.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage exécution interprétation de l'arrêt nullité des ententes valeur litigieuse mandat de répression

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive section to rule on the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1068/2006
Appeal Regarding Validity of Judgment Confirming Arbitration Award
A/3702/2007
Arbitration Award Enforcement Despite Alleged Arbitrator Overreach
A/4323/2005
Vacating Arbitration Award Based on Arbitrator Misconduct
A/1345/2006
Arbitration Award Enforcement Challenge Based on Exceeded Authority and Contract Misinterpretation Upheld
A/134/2007
Enforcement of Arbitration Award Confirming Statutory Claim Interpretation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive section to rule on the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !""""!#$$% !&%"!#$$%



' (') )*)  ') *(

&+  ,- .  "/  #$$% 



   0000000000 



( )*) 1)2*(  3* 1  ##*+ !"#$%&'%&()

                 

   .',/.  

   4 01 +## '/)*"'%%$ #2)# 34*25#.1(#67+ *  8# *#+ +1+1! * 9999999999  *#7 08  *1## 1   ##  : *#  ##  +#.   ;1++  +14  * <

8#++7*+11##&$ +*"'%%$<

1 +## &-*'%%-#=+811##<

8#++#=+&/)#'%%-<

1 +## '>)#'%%-#7#+?#0+ #" +#+ +## &-*'%%-# +0 1)#1+)# 1  :*# ##'%1*"'%%$0 8?0 #?8# *#+#++#+?*1 '%1*"'%%$<



5   5 07*+*?8@-/@/ #7+ +1# 2++  # # A"'%%%5 6+)#2 &=)#'%%/81=08?8)# 1+)#?8#+  # + +## +##11##0++ 7*+<

8+0 )"=0 #BC+  4<



@



,&&&&,'%%-  ./,/.     *(7  (') )*)  ') *(



8,545   9  :55 5  ; "<# *=

&@ +"=<

'@ C 4@  277#D  +# D   E#   !  #                     

1#7* 1+B#7#+;1#1277



,&&&&,'%%-