Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/442/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/442/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statute of Limitations for Breach of Contract for Sale of Goods: Accrual Date for Revocation of Acceptance Claims

Numéro de cause ATAS/442/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a dispute regarding the application of a statute of limitations to claims arising from a contract for the sale of goods, where the seller alleges the buyers wrongfully revoked acceptance of the goods, and the buyers argue the limitations period began when the goods were delivered due to an alleged breach upon delivery. The court reasoned that under the relevant statute, the limitations period for breach of contract for sale of goods generally begins when the cause of action accrues, which, for a breach that is not an explicit warranty breach, occurs when the breach itself occurs, not when the aggrieved party discovers the breach or subsequently revokes acceptance; therefore, the court analyzed the specific timing of the alleged breaches, including the initial delivery and the subsequent events, to determine if the action was commenced within the statutory timeframe, ultimately concluding that the claims related to the initial delivery were time-barred, while other claims might not be, depending on when those specific breaches occurred.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Statute of Limitations for Breach of Contract for Sale of Goods: Accrual Date for Revocation of Acceptance Claims: The court reasoned that under the relevant statute, the limitations period for breach of contract for sale of goods generally begins when the cause of action accrues, which, for a breach that is not an explicit warranty breach, occurs when the breach itself occurs, not when the aggrieved party discovers the breach or subsequently revokes acceptance; therefore, the court analyzed the specific timing of the alleged breaches, including the initial delivery and the subsequent events, to determine if the action was commenced within the statutory timeframe, ultimately concluding that the claims related to the initial delivery were time-barred, while other claims might not be, depending on when those specific breaches occurred.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
vente délai de prescription cause de la demande contrat d'organisation annulation du contrat opération de pension

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the Appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Cited in the dispositive regarding the provision of legal aid for the Respondent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&'#%(() #%#%(()

++

, + ,   ,+  

- . /  $$  %(()



  !"!

!"0000000000 

#

$$     %     $  $    !78!  &$      $'   $   & $           ( )*!$#+,-./0#123(1411   .

$$     %     $   $ $$   $  $   5         (!##16(0#(1442  

                 !"

  496  

 1 

1<  =,"# ! 13 87* 4;;3(  1->" ?") ! ) ! 0"> #  07  !* ! !" ( 7   4 =#1:64(#! (744=*1:@@("7!#! 4-=1:..<

4<  ?88 13 ! =,"# 07#7(  ) ! 0"> #  !7  0#,0"#7!*!07*A08B0?! 70C!#",<

-<  =,"# ! !*( !* !78#8  -1 " 4;;3(  7#7 #"  )!71;*4;;30C7#!0#,<

6<  )!7#7!0#"!###!07*A( 0#07###!78!0#!""B "## ! *  ! 0# B !#  ",( # #  4-=1:..#-1"4;;3<

@< $D,#!!"!(7#77#)B&*!07*A"7!#  ", 0> !  $$     %     $  $    D$      $'   $   D $            E  F &7*#(  -1"4;;3(G'<-46&3.1<-@<

3< # G  !"!(  &# *77 B& 0>!  "0# ! 07*A 0> !  $$    %     $   $  $$   $  $  5         E HF(#B&*"7!#",&7*#G'<434&;6.<2@<

2< !"##7#7#"C0#!#!6"4;;3<=!# !B7B&G!78#!&)*#!!7"0#(I##! ##)<

.< &)!&)=#!!78C7(7#7,!7G=,<

 + 

1< &#<4@!87!7)0,!07*A08( *(**##*!#7!12!7")1::-E'F(#7*, 1=*4;;;(>,07!!!*<B=## 0!D!0##!#G0#,E#<144#14- ! *+ F(

    914.:94;;3 -96  

=,!!!*"07##!&#<2-<1!87!7 07*A 08 ! 4@ = 1:.4 EF( # G >*  ) #!!01J#4;;-(!#(0>B&88  7#7#"E#<164 F(C7#!&880#,)! 7! 70##!7#"70=,!!*<

4< $&#<44'E*#*,!01=*4;;;F( ! !*(  0## ! # B !#  ", # 0#,7 8"7"# C#<144(14-(161#164 /#<-G@ '&00B# 0,"##G#87E<1F<?B=#(0##! #G0#,0!G!887#0##!#(,"#7 ! * ! ) 0, C## 7*#"#  ""# ! !*( #  0##!#(,"#7!*!)0,C##7*#"# ""#!!",E8<#<46'F<(=# G  0## ! # # G &* ! ) 0, C##  ""# !   ! ",  #7I# !  ""# ! !* E ' 14.  4-;/ '14:666F<

D0>(=,!0">#!70#,0"#7!* !07*AB!#",0!"!<!#0## #( !D 0#(  ! ",(  4- = 1:..( !D# 0#  -1" 4;;3( !#GB=,"#!!*#!*C7#<

-< $  !"# 0!#(  0## B 0!#  ", 0  #!-46&3.18<-@(#!BB0!"   # ! 434&;6.8<2@(  #7I# A# !7=G 7#7 7 0  ### ! 07*A !78!<   !#GC+70"##!134&-6;8<2;E-46&3.18<-@K4F( #!B&!#"##!1-1&;468<6;E434&;6.8<2@K4F(!#B D#  !"! B !#  !78#* G  C+70  "## ! -1&-138<-;E134&-6;<2;+1-1&;46<6;F<

6< 8"7"# G  =0!( !0  = !7#"# 0  0#, =B&""#!#8#!0##!#!!"(=# !*7)778!##0##!#G!#7I#"0# "##!+< #7I##7#C"""7,&#<14 !&!07*A08*(**##*!#7 ! 1. * 1:.6 E 4F    #C 7,"#(  + # 07 E '0)7-39;4!1.=#4;;-F

@<  7""#   0L(  07! 7## ,## E#< 2- < 4  # .:H<1!07!!"##*!140#")1:.@F<

MMM

    914.:94;;3 696  

+   1  + ,   ,+  



23454   6  744 4  8" $)% 9

1< *#  $$     %     $  $      D$        $ '   $   D $            E  F G #87( ! "0#! (""!-1&-138<-;G $$    %     $   $ $$   $  $   5          E HF  8* ! !"  (  B ! #7I# "0#   ! !7#(!>-1"4;;3=B&""#!#8#<

4< DA!"##B!)<

-< #B07!#,##<

6< 8"  0# !  B& 0*# 8"  #  07# I# !  !7 ! -; = !>  #8# 0 0 ""!7 !7  ) 87!7 ! ( $?NO?8B 3( 3;;6   (  # C"0<  !7  0# I# 0,7<  "7" !# K F !B C#"# B !7  # !7 )#   # 0 !  !7##B7/)FC00B"#8#"0*!"!## #!7/F0#,#!07##<$"7"  ## 0  # 77"# 7"77  ## F )F # F +!(  )87!7!00#"#>B& !*!7*)<"7"!"#"A ! 0*( B # =#(  B  !7 ##B7 # &*00 ! B7#7C07!7#E#<1-4(1;3#1;.F<  ,88>  7!#K         '' P$ P 08"!07#I###87C0#BDGD8887!7 !0,88

    914.:94;;3