Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/440/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/440/2007 Généré par l'IA

Tax Assessment Challenge Regarding Statutory Constitutionality

Numéro de cause ATAS/440/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner challenged the validity of certain tax assessments, arguing that the governing statute was unconstitutional as applied because the calculations resulted in discriminatory and excessive tax liabilities, particularly for property held for a specific time frame before the assessment date. The court reasoned that the statutory language clearly authorized the assessment method used and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear violation of constitutional rights or an unconstitutional application of the statute, affirming the assessments because the legislative action, though potentially harsh, was within the scope of the enacted law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Tax Assessment Challenge Regarding Statutory Constitutionality: The court reasoned that the statutory language clearly authorized the assessment method used and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear violation of constitutional rights or an unconstitutional application of the statute, affirming the assessments because the legislative action, though potentially harsh, was within the scope of the enacted law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de la taxation fiscale constitutionnalité prétention légale impôt foncier assujettissement à l'impôt droit de manifester

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/932/2007
Property Tax Assessment Statute Validity Challenge
A/1480/2006
Property Tax Assessment Validity and Constitutional Challenge
A/141/2007
Tax Assessment Challenge and Affirmation
A/3081/2006
Tax Assessment Procedures and Constitutionality
A/555/2006
Tax Assessment Validity Based on Statutory Interpretation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           &'()*&(++* !&))+&(++,

!

 ! !"    " 

-. /  (/ 01 (++, 



  !"#! !   

 !  !



$

%    &&  ' ()* "+   



            !" #$   %   

  -#.  

 #!

)1 23!$ --2-00/)/4!5!6  6 7!4$  7"  8   !  "  )9/, $  ")9/0!" $ -) "!6)9991

-1 &5++. 23!$7"$" 6 7!4$ "  7$3 7 !$"  8  7"8: 7+ ' 7 5 "7; $!31

,1  23!$  8 $ 8 "+$+  -< =$ -00/ $  "$" $! (++ 6 ">7$!6-00/7;"$ 7$31

.1 8$3$  6 "$7! $$' !  7 (7$$ 673 -(,*-+1*<74 % $  6 73   ' $  48     ,0 28 -00* ?1

<1 $@ ! 8 8(7A$$8"1

/1  ->+"8-00* 6 "+!" ! ' 7$3++$"6 (8 8  ! 7"$"1

*1 (6 (62$  "+;""$"3 "@231

 "!

)1 ($1-< +" "673 7"8:7+ 888$$8 $" )* "!6)99,B%C$"83 )28-000437"   81'2$$ 7 D 7$$ $@7$3B$1)--$)-,   8? C 23   8!7"$$ ($1*,1) +" " 7"8: 7+  -< 2 )9>- BC $ @ 48  6 $  7)=$-00, $74'(++  "$"$!B$1).- C;"$ (++7$36  "  "7$$ "$!"723  81

-1 &($1--%B8$83 7)28-000C  8  7$$  $ ' $  !3 $ 7$3" +!"!$ ;$1)--)-,).)$).- E$1,@< %(77'$ 73!$$@$+"B1)C15'2$7$$  $@7$37 @ ++"$7$$ $3!$"

    #,-./#-00/ ,#.  

 8  6 73 ;$$ "8$!$  !!$  8 $  7$$ $3!$" 8 673;$$"8$!$ !!$  !3B+1$1-.%C12$ @  7$$  $ $ @ (8  6 73 ;$$  !!$     !3  $"A$   !!$  8 B % )->  -,0E %)-9...C1

 D74  23  7!4 $   "  7$3 7 !$"  7$$  $ ' $  !3 7  ! 1  $ 7$$$ D7$ !3-) "!6)999$ D$7$ -<=$-00/ $@'23!$  8$ 8;"$1

,1 &3!$7$$'7 $!37 ! $ -(,*-+1*<$ ' !  7 (8 81  !  $@;?"7!$$ )()>/+1.0 B-(,*-+1*<F-C1

.1 +!"!$ @  27  7  2 "$!$ 7  7$3 2'(!!$ $+$ 7$$ $  !2$ 8"6""+ $$7$$ $@ $"A$!7$ !$$ ?1 $"A$$"$;!!!"3($1)- ( 7"8:7+888$$8 $"  )> 8 )9>. B -C    $; "3!$  ? $ 7" B %76",/#0- )>2$-00,C

<1  "!!$   7G  7"  "$$ 3$$ B$1 *, 1 -  $ >9H1) 7"  !$$8 )-7$!6)9><C1



III



    #,-./#-00/ .#.  

  "!#  ! !"    " 

 

234-- 5 1 6   178 9*( ":;

)1 8$  % $  6 73   ' $  48 @ $+"  !7$  6 73 J -)//.)>  1   !! )()>/+1.0!7$@874 % $$$$ 77"$8 !$$ !7$ 673@K5+8 ! ")9/,' $"A$!7$  "$ 4-<=$-00/2'(!!$ $+$1

-1 D: !$$' 61

,1 $'7" $3$$1

.1 +!  7$   'D 78$ +!  $  7"$ A$   "  ,0 2 4  $+$ 74  6 +" " B&5LM5+'//00.  C78 !$4  $ 76+!"!$;$1>- +" " 6+" " )* 2 -00< B %CE  !"!   $  '   !$+ $ !: 78$7$3$ $ ! $E $ A$  "  6 +" " 7 8 7$  7 8 "$' ;  $  ($1 .-  %1  7"$ A$ $  74  7  $8'"!!!: 78 8$A$2$@(81  3++4  " $F            H  & :   



7+! 7"$A$$$+";7$$@% $$$$ 77"$8  !$$  !7$  6 73 @ K5  'D@ D+++" " 73++

    #,-./#-00/