Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/432/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/432/2014 Généré par l'IA

Appeal on Cost Allocation Following Partially Successful Claim and Expert Assessment

Numéro de cause ATAS/432/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter concerned an appeal challenging a lower court's decision regarding the responsibility for costs following a partially accepted claim that had been subject to an expert opinion, where the initial claimant had obtained a favorable outcome but not entirely as sought. The reviewing court partially admitted the appeal, finding that the initial procedural complexity and the expert involvement warranted a nuanced allocation of costs; specifically, the costs related to the expert assessment should be shared, but the appellate court adjusted the final distribution of legal costs to reflect the partial success of the appeal itself.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal on Cost Allocation Following Partially Successful Claim and Expert Assessment: The reviewing court partially admitted the appeal, finding that the initial procedural complexity and the expert involvement warranted a nuanced allocation of costs; specifically, the costs related to the expert assessment should be shared, but the appellate court adjusted the final distribution of legal costs to reflect the partial success of the appeal itself.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
répartition des frais demande partielle frais d'expertise expertise juridique contrôle de la procédure qualité pour recourir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited in the dispositive regarding the distribution of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2291/2013

### [ATAS/432/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1969678) du 26.03.2014 ( PC ) , PARTIELMNT ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0004/ATAS_000432_2014_A_2291_2013.pdf)

* /