Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/432/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/432/2004 Généré par l'IA

Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Policy Exclusion Exception

Numéro de cause ATAS/432/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter involved a review of a lower court's decision regarding an insurance dispute where coverage was denied based on a specific exclusion; the court determined that the facts presented demonstrated the exclusion was inapplicable because the underlying conduct fell within a carved-out exception to that exclusion, thus reversing the denial of coverage and ordering the insurer to provide indemnification under the policy terms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Policy Exclusion Exception: The matter involved a review of a lower court's decision regarding an insurance dispute where coverage was denied based on a specific exclusion; the court determined that the facts presented demonstrated the exclusion was inapplicable because the underlying conduct fell within a carved-out exception to that exclusion, thus reversing the denial of coverage and ordering the insurer to provide indemnification under the policy terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
couverture d'assurance réserve d'assurance objet du litige exclusion des nova mesure d'éloignement réexamen par l'assureur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive section for the apportionment of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1397/2000
Insurance Policy Exclusion Interpretation Affirming Denial of Coverage
A/4071/2006
Insurance Policy Coverage Dispute and Exclusion Interpretation
A/1245/2006
Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Policy Exclusion Interpretation
A/1830/2007
Insurer Coverage Dispute Based on Ambiguous Exclusion
A/522/2002
Insurance Coverage Dispute and Interpretation of Policy Language

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive section for the apportionment of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               %&'()%*+++ ,%'-*%*++'

,

! ,! .,"  !. ".

'/ 01   * #  *++' 



2 3  !""#$"## % &'()&+ %   



% 

4. .," 5".," 6(,%  # #0 $ -.&*&&   */



           !" # $

   4*124  

&5  $##%$67# %$!% #%"0##8#496 :;$ &$0<*3330 =>55""#$%#  "## -?4 7 #0 $% #< #%$"5*@/,,5*3$0 #%7 = A%# BBBBBBBBBB  &//'   &/// C  #  % D7%# $ %0 #% 8#49   ;  %#$ %00    $ # %0# = % # #% 6E

*5 %# F &/$0<*333#C#$ $"## E

25 #9%$#  -D$!# E

,5 !$#$%0 #%%$ #$&/7#*33, 1&,2*1*333%$C  $%=  #%= !% $0"## $>$%  $#9# E

(5 %#$  C  0 # %0# = % #< #% %%$ =  %0# = % # #% $ !47##   7#7  "$ 8 5 *+  :;E

)5  $  0 %G     % =    #% = !%  $  % #%7# $!$##%# #D#E



 . ",6  ,! .,"  !. ".

  03 7  8   5$ &9* "

  3

&5 H%# %E

 3

*5 !$0      $##% $   67#  % $!% #% "0##&$0<*333E

25 # C!#! H$!0%0 #%$!#$0# 5  D""#I  #$ I

 1&*2,(1*333   42124       J#$  A  #         

%#%"%0$ .  % #"#K #D""



 1&*2,(1*333