Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/42/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/42/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Supersession of Liquidated Damages Clause

Numéro de cause ATAS/42/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved a contractual disagreement concerning the calculation of liquidated damages following a breach, where the initial agreement provided a formula but subsequent amendments introduced different payment terms impacting the final damage calculation. The court reasoned that the clear and unambiguous language of the later amendment superseded the prior contractual provision regarding damages, holding that the parties intended to substitute the original liquidated damages clause with the terms specified in the subsequent agreement, thereby affirming the application of the latter calculation method.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Supersession of Liquidated Damages Clause: The court reasoned that the clear and unambiguous language of the later amendment superseded the prior contractual provision regarding damages, holding that the parties intended to substitute the original liquidated damages clause with the terms specified in the subsequent agreement, thereby affirming the application of the latter calculation method.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels règlement du litige mode de calcul interprétation complétive du contrat concours de responsabilités clause de subsidiarité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the imposition of court costs for the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/1762/2002
Contractual Breach and Liquidated Damages Calculation
A/1924/2007
Contractual Interpretation of Liquidated Damages Calculation
A/646/2007
Contractual Penalty vs. Liquidated Damages Calculation
A/2781/2006
Contract Dispute Over Liquidated Damages Enforceability
A/1671/2002
Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clause in Contract Termination

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the imposition of court costs for the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                !"#$ #$$%  &# #$$'



( )(* *+*  (*  + )

,-. %  /0 1 #$$' 



  !"#$%  & "#"

"#  !"#$%'(



)

*  +,  &  !"-.! "$4" /)-01-!-.02  3-



            

  058  

* 2)

-9  :;#) " 7 /)#< 0221!  -2'# =#< " < " /#' )  /$  "( " "#  ! $  ->70! ) "   !$->78!?)#$") (#< ->>>9

09 ,=446":;#)/$)$! <"/#')"$  /); / #)$ " ( " /$(@ /4 ? /   /")#;9

69 :;#)""()"("$4)4--)<0221)$)$)# "A44 <"$/B$)"/);9

89 ,"A*  +,  &  "01(#<0221!  /)) ? /")  #; /    ) " 8A.8049.2CDA6-74902E-A8784982F9

19  "#)  $)$ )# B BE$/B  ") " 0. (#< 0221 )  <"$"?$/))"#G#")?!! //))4"#)$")4$#/)"</; ""#"##"0A80-49829"$-D"$#<0221$)$ "$B"#"/"$)#9

D9 A<"A<:)""$4B$!$)$;"$%:;9

* +)

-9 A)9 01 "   4$"$   < /; "  /$(@ /4!(!(())(")$"-7"$#<->>6C+F! )$(;-:(0222!';/$"""(9? :))/"H"/))")%/);C)9-00) -06 " (E F!:;"""(#/$))"A)9769 -"4$"$/$(@/4"01:->.0CF!)% '( <)""/-I)0226!")! /'?A44$)$)#C)9-80 F!B$)"A44/); <"$"$/))"$)#$/:;""(.

09 ,A)900 +C()(;"/-:(0222F! ""(!/))")?")#;)/);$ 4#$#)B)9-00!-06!-8-)-80 J)96%1+A//?) /;#))%)4$C9-F9=?:)!/))"

    5670250221 658  

)%/);/"%"44$)/))")!;#)$ " ( " < /; B)) $()#)  ##) " "(! )  /)) " )! ;#)$ " ( " < /; B)) $()#)##)""#;C49)908+F9 !:)%/))"))%A("</;B)) ##)""#;)$G)"##)""(C + -0.062J +-0>888F9

69  H/'!  :; " /#' )  "$  /); / #)$ " /)) " ) ? ")  #; /  "#"9  ") /)))"H/)"#;!-2(#<->>>!)"H)/) --)<0221!")%?:;#)""()"(B$)9

,;#)!/))?/")#;/ "#" ) " 8A.80 49 .2 CDA6-7 49 02 E -A878 49 82F 49!  )$G) @) "$:%$)$$/A)))"/$(@"$4"9 "#" ") %  BE$/  #)) " 0A80-4982 C 8A.80 49 .2K 0F! " ) ?A //)" % *   +,    &   " ( )) ##! /$))#)$"/))")$$/")#;! #/)"</;""#"L600-06/'"+")" </;"A,, %M9

89 4#$#) %  :/"! "/  : "$)#) /  /); :?A ##) " )4) "  /)) " )  "  "#!  :) "($ <$$4 " )) /))  ") % " )$G) #/)   #)) " E9  )$G) ) $  )B ### $;  A)9 -0 " A"   /$(@ /4 (! (() ) (")$ " -. ( ->.8 C 0F    )B $;#)!  E ) /$ C +  /<$  6D520 " -. :) 0226F

19 $##)/N!/$"$));))C)97690) .>*9-"/$""#))("-0/)#<->.1F9

OOO



    5670250221 858  

  +)2  )(* *+*  (*  + )



34565-- 7  855 5  9 /'# +:

-9 () *   +,    &   % )4$! " #/) "    !  ## " 0A80- 49 82 49 %  +") " < /; "A, ,  % M! #/) " < /; L 600-0-  4( " "#  9

09 () *   +,    &    % (!  / "  #))! " )$G) #/)   " "$)! "'  -- )< 0220 :?A##)")4)9

69 H@"#))?"<9

89 )?/$");))9

19 4#  /) "  ?A /() 4#  )  /$) G) "  "$ " 62 : "'  )4) / / ##"$ "$  < 4$"$ " ! ,=PQ=4? D! D228   !  ) B#/9  "$  /) G) /;$9  #$# ") K F "? B)#) ? "$  ) "$ <)   ) / "  "$))?$J<FB//?#)4)#/("#")) )"$JF/);)"/$))9,#$#  )) /  ) $$#) $#$$  )) F <F ) F E"!  <4$"$"//)#)'?A "("$(<9#$#"#)#@ " /(! ? ) :)!  ?  "$ ))?$ ) A(// " ?$)$B/$"$)C)9-60!-2D)-2.F9  ;44'  $")K       &R S @       

/4#"/$)G)))4$B/)?H%H444$"$ "/;44

    5670250221