Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/414/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/414/2004 Généré par l'IA

Enforceability of Automatic Termination Clause Without Opportunity to Cure

Numéro de cause ATAS/414/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a contractual provision allowing for automatic termination upon written notice for default, without providing an opportunity to cure, was enforceable. The dispute arose when one party claimed the other was in default and promptly terminated the agreement based on the clause, while the defaulting party argued that industry custom and implied obligations required notice and an opportunity to cure before termination. The court reasoned that absent specific contractual language mandating a notice and cure period, the plain language of the agreement permitting immediate termination upon written notice for default controls, thereby upholding the contract's express terms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Enforceability of Automatic Termination Clause Without Opportunity to Cure: The dispute arose when one party claimed the other was in default and promptly terminated the agreement based on the clause, while the defaulting party argued that industry custom and implied obligations required notice and an opportunity to cure before termination. The court reasoned that absent specific contractual language mandating a notice and cure period, the plain language of the agreement permitting immediate termination upon written notice for default controls, thereby upholding the contract's express terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
résiliation immédiate clause obligationnelle défaut d'une partie décision exécutoire validité de la résiliation de bail violation essentielle du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This provision is cited in order 2 to declare the appeal inadmissible based on the applicable procedural rule.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in order 3 to determine the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               "#$%&"&%" '"(#(")&&(

'

* ' *+ +',+  *+ , 

)-  ./    )  )&&( 



0,+' ,+ 1 ! "#$$#%""& $ #   ' (   !# 



# 

,00  +',+  2*+3 +4  '$ " "% )#*+,-!



            !

   '0.1'  

  $%$  #     "  56 $  7#% "# #" " $"$"$87 $9$"!7 $# # :

7$8 :

##" "#$$"!7 $# # "";$9:

  $""#  ##" "# $ 8  $ ";%  , 86$ $ 7  $" ;" #6"$9 <  #7#$:

  # ""  # %# ./+0=.0441'0'  > ./+0*.0441'0'  > ./+1/.0441'0' > .0134.0441'0' > .0222.0441'0' > .022+.0441'1' :

8$"$#% "#$%$ "$14%0442:

$ ; # $   $" "    #!     " $8   ; 8 $" 7#%% $""###" "#,8# $9#  ;  ?  #"  $8    ;8 7#"  7"   # $ 7  " <#" , @$?  ; #  77"7  "" #A ./+0=.41"# " $$8#$  " <;8,$""#$7"" "!$   ; "#$;" #6" $? ;7#$:

$""###" "#$8 ,8# $?  =!"0442 #$/1%"0442B

  ,' 0  ' *+ +',+  *+ , 

 2..   5

6.7   8  5   2! #9) ,:

/B $#  <# "# $ # $ 87  CCCCCCCCCC   $  9 # $@  & ' (   # ./+14.41B

0B D$ 8"  "# $ $"   $8       "  " "# $ 8 B+= B

1B " ;8"  "#"#7#%% ,8 B+* B

 ./0123.0444  '1.1'   2B !" $#$B

3B 7#%   " $  ;8 !  7#% # #     E  $  $" $ /4 <# $-  # "7" "#  " #%%$ $  "F 7$ $  D5G"H5#7;" I I442     #" @%"B  $"    E  ##6B  %%#" $#" J K "$"; @ % ;$""## $"#F "" $$""#  ;: FK @# # ; %# "7 "  "% #!#" $%$     $""#: K #   "6  #  $ #   B D"  %%#"  # "   #" %  % #   K FK   K "'$  "F 7$ $   #     % "-   # ;8" $! $ "!FB  %%#" $ # % "# #  %#) $ !;"# <#" "";$""# ; 8!#$;  @$"# L B/10/4I /4=KB  677"J  "$ J   "" FF#"                #"#7#%$ E  # "7"@ """;8,877"7$ $#"677



 ./0123.0444