Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/402/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/402/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation and Compelled Arbitration Based on Incorporation by Reference

Numéro de cause ATAS/402/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A litigant challenged a court's ruling regarding the scope of an agreement, specifically concerning whether a set of documents constituted a contract that bound the parties to arbitration, arguing that the lower court improperly considered extrinsic evidence. The reviewing court determined that the lower court did not err because the operative contract explicitly incorporated the set of documents by reference, and the plain language of that incorporation, supported by the context of the parties' dealings, sufficiently established a mutual agreement to be bound by the incorporated arbitration clause, thus upholding the decision compelling arbitration.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contract Interpretation and Compelled Arbitration Based on Incorporation by Reference: The reviewing court determined that the lower court did not err because the operative contract explicitly incorporated the set of documents by reference, and the plain language of that incorporation, supported by the context of the parties' dealings, sufficiently established a mutual agreement to be bound by the incorporated arbitration clause, thus upholding the decision compelling arbitration.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat arbitrage convention de renvoi pouvoir d'examen compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs théorie de l'incorporation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the final order regarding the imposition of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

This article is cited in the final order concerning the allocation of legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%&"'$$% "($'"'$$%

))

 )* *  ) *

+  % !'  '$$% 



  !

!

"" # ""         $%&' !&' ()) % *$*+,-  . "  

                !

   #-.1#  

!  ,   % )  % -+ & -++/ %'  2 ! %   3 4  !!  %' %5 ""  % 63&7'83!9+/0:*;+< 6!4!4%=83'!6 2%'2!!!&3&! "" %%!8733!4% %!>?&6@

'3%5 "" %17-++/!8572!'%%= 4%'%&7'7!'!'%'85'--&-++/!3 %%'33!@

%7%!7'%@

7!%3!8%%&3!3:&-++,@

%!%*<7-++/344!3!%5% % 5!!! 4 !!  63=6 ! '$  3!  A3! % 5?? % 3! ! ?! ! %  && % 7 8  ! % %&%45?&'@

 !  -45!),/)*%?'%'3!B''%%! %%/!2-+++C D$%'33!! !47%533!5!37!!>!!8@

5 53=$  !  %'' 533 8 !! %' % &7' %  %%3!9+/0:*;+< BB'3 "" 8!@

!!?%'33!5'!'%35!&'$ %'%&7'E!'!'!?'--&-++/85'@

%=3'!$3'&!'$3!45F!%''72@

5?$  7 %  4 3'=%$    >!? 3 % 3! 5% % &3! 3 % 5!!! %5'7! A3! % 5?? % 3!!?!% &&%7@



.*+/0.-++/  #1.1#  

)  . * )* *  ) *

!

/0-,-   1  2-- -  34 #%' * 5

  ,- 

*) '72)

-) ?&  3! %  4G 37! ?&  !  3'! F! %  %' % 1+ > %=  !?! 3 3 &&%' %'  2 ?'%' % $ "HIJH?4 /$ /++;   $  ! A&3)  %'  3! F! 3B')  &'& %!K D %4 A!&!4%'!%'2!!3%%' !!4'@ 2D A3 3 4 &!?  !& 37 %&% !! ! %'@ D 3!  B!   %  3'!!) "  &'&  !! 3  ! ''&! '&''  !! D 2D ! D #%$  2?'%'%33!&!=4G %7%'72)&'&%&!&E % 37$ 4 ! >!$  4  %' !!4' ! G733 % 4'!'A3'%'!C!)*1-$*+/!*+:D)  B??=  '%!K   E" ' 

3?&%3'!F!!!?'A3!4G8G???'%' %!'3243B??



.*+/0.-++/