Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/391/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/391/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Breach and Summary Judgment Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/391/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The initial suit involved a claim concerning contractual obligations and subsequent litigation regarding an alleged breach and the determination of remedies, with the dispute centering on the scope of implied covenants and the propriety of summary judgment. The court reasoned that the evidence presented failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding the breach, as the actions taken were within the permitted scope of the underlying agreement, thereby affirming the lower court's grant of summary judgment because the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Breach and Summary Judgment Affirmation: The court reasoned that the evidence presented failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding the breach, as the actions taken were within the permitted scope of the underlying agreement, thereby affirming the lower court's grant of summary judgment because the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle objet du litige confirmation de compétence jugement civil interprétation complétive du contrat acte de cautionnement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceeding.
Généré par l'IA
A/1254/2002
Contractual Breach and Damages Affirmation
A/983/2006
Contractual Breach and Damages Affirmation
A/2075/2004
Contract Interpretation and Summary Judgment Affirmance
A/1425/2002
Contract Dispute and Breach of Contract Affirmation
A/740/2005
Contractual Breach Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceeding.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%%&#'((' #)*$#'((%

++

 +, ,  + ,

-.  /  !*  '((% 



   01111111111 ! "#" $   ! %&!''(&#!'##



! 

22 ,  ,3+4,  #!#& ')*+,-

                !"

   31.43  

  '&## ' %55# ! ' % 3#-#'#!& 6#3 ,7 % 8 ' 1 !9 1221:

    ' " ;;;;;;;;;; ' 12 !9  1221 5 & '-!  ## ! '    !#,  '% 3-## !  -#-! ! '% 3#-#'#!& &!!:

! ##' #9!' #/ <! 1224:

 !# ' !#+=#122>:

% ''%? !#'/4'&9 122>' #9'&:

  !'%? !#'  ;;;;;;;;;;)@#! '/*5&- # 1220:

 !#''!# '10- #1220 '( !#! -'% ':

!!'  ' #! ( % !A 02 '  # 5&'&      !# B&&  ' ' #! '   # ' C !9  1222 6 8  &-#! (  #!#B  !!   '  !!#' #-!D!  &B& ! !#A

  % !# E* F A 4 '  #     &'  '##! !#- 6 8  #'#!&!&  !(#9!#!B#'A



./00+.1221  34.43  

+  2 , +, ,  + ,

! 3556   7

85696   :  766 6  3" $-' , ;

/A  ! G %  (%# H! G " ;;;;;;;;;;  ' #! G  ! !#, '%#-#'#!&',/ #/5'& 'B &'%#-#'#!&'E*I &  5!# '% ##!& !! ' %!#-#!& !& #  ' % & ? &GE2I##('%##!&'>CI'!#-#!&&B, ' 12I:

1A %)'!!('9#:

4A '% G-  G";;;;;;;;;;#'#!&'1J2225 A:

>A #!#'% !A02 #5  !#'(%-!5    !  &! D!''&#'42= ',!#5#!# # '&' & #95&'& ' K@L#M @5(#CC22>   ! #?# A'&#!D!  B&A&# '#!7 8#'#( ?!!('&##  !'&# 9!# #!' '&##!!(&:98?  (!#5#!#-# '' !! ! '&##:8 ! #B! '  &!!AK#&#  !#!   ! # &&! && &  !!  8 98 ! 8 #3'  #95&'& '  !  !#,    (%# '- '&  # -9A&# '  !#  ) '  - (#  ! =#! ## (  '&## !!(& ! %- ' (&!&?&'#&  !6 !A/41/2C!/2E8A    B 55#, 7  &#'!7   )K & #"    

#5 ' &! D!!!#5#&? !###(%G%55#5&'&  ' # B 55



./00+.1221