Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/381/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/381/2007 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Withdrawal in Unemployment Insurance Case

Numéro de cause ATAS/381/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant filed an appeal on January 24, 2007, against a decision on opposition issued by the Cantonal Employment Office on January 15, 2007, concerning unemployment insurance matters. However, the appellant subsequently withdrew the appeal via a letter dated March 12, 2007, which was subsequently forwarded to the Cantonal Insurance Tribunal. The court, acknowledging the withdrawal, officially took note of the action and removed the case from its roster.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal in Unemployment Insurance Case: However, the appellant subsequently withdrew the appeal via a letter dated March 12, 2007, which was subsequently forwarded to the Cantonal Insurance Tribunal. The court, acknowledging the withdrawal, officially took note of the action and removed the case from its roster.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assurance chômage retrait de l'opposition suppression de la prestation d'assurance chômage abandon d'emploi organe de l'assurance-chômage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited implicitly through the disposition which orders costs, although the exact article for costs is not explicitly mentioned in the brief dispositive orders ('Prend acte du retrait du recours. / Raye la cause du rôle.'). Since no other substantive or procedural articles are cited in the dispositive, and costs are typically governed by such provisions, I must rely strictly on what is explicitly listed. As no explicit reference is found in the listed orders (which only state taking note of withdrawal and striking the case from the roll), the output must be empty based on the strict rule: include ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive.
Généré par l'IA
A/2371/2004
Appeal Withdrawal in Unemployment Insurance Case
A/3702/2017
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal
A/4267/2006
Appeal Withdrawal in Unemployment Insurance Case
A/4244/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Unemployment Insurance Case
A/3109/2009
Unemployment Benefits Appeal Withdrawal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited implicitly through the disposition which orders costs, although the exact article for costs is not explicitly mentioned in the brief dispositive orders ('Prend acte du retrait du recours. / Raye la cause du rôle.'). Since no other substantive or procedural articles are cited in the dispositive, and costs are typically governed by such provisions, I must rely strictly on what is explicitly listed. As no explicit reference is found in the listed orders (which only state taking note of withdrawal and striking the case from the roll), the output must be empty based on the strict rule: include ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/303/2007

### [ATAS/381/2007](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1959990) du 05.04.2007 ( CHOMAG ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2007/0003/ATAS_000381_2007_A_303_2007.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/303/2007 ATAS/381/2007 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 5 du 4 avril 2007

En la cause

Madame B_________, domiciliée , AÏRE · recourante

contre

CAISSE CANTONALE GENEVOISE DE CHOMAGE, rue de Montbrillant 40, GENEVE · intimée

Vu le recours du 24 janvier 2007 de Mme B_________ contre la décision sur opposition du 15 janvier 2007 de l'Office cantonal de l'emploi (OCE), ainsi que la réponse de celui-ci du 8 février 2007;

Vu le retrait du recours par courrier du 12 mars 2007 de la recourante à l'OCE, missive que ce dernier a transmis au Tribunal de céans par fax du 15 mars 2007;

Attendu qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle;

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Statuant

Prend acte du retrait du recours.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière: Claire CHAVANNES · La présidente : Maya CRAMER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le