Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/377/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/377/2006 Généré par l'IA

Misrepresentation and Investment Profitability Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/377/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute involving multiple instances of alleged misrepresentation regarding the profitability of an investment opportunity, specifically in relation to sales figures reported across different periods. The court reasoned that while some representations were sufficiently specific to constitute actionable misrepresentations, others were merely general optimistic projections or estimations, and thus not grounds for liability. Furthermore, the court found that certain plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations based on when they purchased the investment, while other claims were timely, leading to a determination of liability only for misrepresentations related to specific, timely-filed purchase transactions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Misrepresentation and Investment Profitability Dispute: The court reasoned that while some representations were sufficiently specific to constitute actionable misrepresentations, others were merely general optimistic projections or estimations, and thus not grounds for liability. Furthermore, the court found that certain plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations based on when they purchased the investment, while other claims were timely, leading to a determination of liability only for misrepresentations related to specific, timely-filed purchase transactions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
placement de capitaux droit au gain faux renseignements sur des entreprises commerciales valeur litigieuse responsabilité pour le prospectus d'émission atteinte astucieuse aux intérêts pécuniaires

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Art. 64 LTF

This provision is cited in the dispositive to rule on legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%&"'((' ")"'((+

!!

, !-, .  ,! .-

/ 0 )

 % 1 '((+ 



 !"#$%   !#&'( ' $'""#)$'""*'+  ,

'

--     ) ,,    !" '#$ ./0!&'123!4244   45

                ! 

   92619  

,  2-

! & "$ " 4/ (#: 4///! );; ' <( " )9 ("'$ =9&> ) ?  '.$ %     "#9' ")("'$ ") #'' " 4)883;@ ' " "#9' #&$#' & A'=582;@?'&;'=182;@?(;;'4"$#:4///B

! & A<#' " 5 A' 2882  # &'' " ) A<!  : " &#> ' "  $&:C ' ' " >(  '':$ %  $&! "#    <" "  ;' , ! $  4/77! ' "#$    % (! & # ' ")(! ' ;##&!##"4)238;@%''"':'%)''" ;#B

  4 ': 2882! "#    "#"$ %   ' <("#&'=9&>D? C'"'#'($ '#&$#'&A'';'")("B

!&"$"4E':2882!;#$)$C"#9' #&$#' " )9("'$  ;( " A' ' " );' ' ($ % &' " 4 (#: 2882 % "#  ! $'' &$$ C );;'&;%$(''''"$$'''$B

! & ' " 23 ': 2882! )$  "#"$ %   " "$  "$B

''$'$'$'#4(#:2882% ##'" #'>") 9#&$''#'>B

  0 (#: 2882! )$  "#"$  ''' " );;' &; %  B

!&A<#'"'"45;$(2885! ##'" ;$$':#'");;'&;%"$"4E':2882'$($ ;"B

 )$  'A'$  " "' "#''; &> " : ;$"$ " = - ?B

  "! "  F' " 0 A' 2885!  A'$  "#" " ''' " );;'&;B

    $'$ '#!  "' " 4 G' 2885!  : ' " B



6473162882  95619      " )$  "C$  ': C  #"' '"' '  B

.-!  !.-



)('")'@7/@4"'"42&'#:4/73&$" "#''(= B 348?!''"#';%&$"B

)('"&"'"''"'"."H@



6473162882  91619  

!  .-2  !-, .  ,! .-



345   6  7   89 #+' .:

4@ "'"''"'A'$23':2882'"$"4E ':2882@

2@ ."H@

5@ 'C&$"'<''@   <;;>  &$"'         -- I, I



&;#"&$'F''';$J&'CK%K;;;$"$ "&<;;





6473162882