Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/371/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/371/2006 Généré par l'IA

Foreclosure Sale Validity Challenged Due to Notice Deficiency

Numéro de cause ATAS/371/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned a party's challenge to the validity of a lien foreclosure sale conducted after a default on a financial obligation, alleging that the notice provided for the sale was deficient because it failed to include the specific dates and times for the sale, which resulted in an inadequate sale price. The court reasoned that while the statute required notice to be posted at the courthouse door, the statute did not explicitly mandate the inclusion of the sale's precise date and time within that posted notice, and thus, strict compliance with the statutory notice requirement was met, validating the foreclosure sale despite the alleged insufficiency of the information provided to the public.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Foreclosure Sale Validity Challenged Due to Notice Deficiency: The court reasoned that while the statute required notice to be posted at the courthouse door, the statute did not explicitly mandate the inclusion of the sale's precise date and time within that posted notice, and thus, strict compliance with the statutory notice requirement was met, validating the foreclosure sale despite the alleged insufficiency of the information provided to the public.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
annonces publiques procédure de réalisation de gage immobilier condition de validité défaut d'une partie gage immobilier titre représentatif de marchandises

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               #$%&#'(() #&%$#'(()

!!

* !*   *!   

+ , )

 $- . '(() 



 !!!!!!!!!!" #$% & '% ( (#  % )'%((*%  + +

%

,,     ) --  .  " %#' (/01"$%234"5355   56

               ! ! "

   .373.  

  :%  ('  $$% ( ):: % ( ).&(%' ;. $<=) >(30&#?3884@

   ( A !!!!!!!!!! ( 51 B& 3889" ('$' $< ( ? %(C)%(%%('@

  $%   ( -   ( 36 # 3889 :#%  ? ( 'D)$%EF:%  (%(33:'&3889@

   ( A !!!!!!!!!! ( 6 & 3889 $ D  (' %  @

%%((%D)%AG0A5($'((#%%&(53 $%#?50G4; >"%%(#%:C$'(@

!  /  !*   *!   



01232   4  522 2  6" $)' 7

5A (%(%%(@

3A /(HA  F::<  $'(%   /- ' 

$:#($'%I%%%:'J$%$F::



751673889