Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/359/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/359/2006 Généré par l'IA

Tax Assessment Review Regarding Intent and Business Purpose

Numéro de cause ATAS/359/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner sought review of a decision upholding a tax assessment, arguing that the relevant statutory provision required a specific finding regarding the taxpayer's intent, which the lower court failed to make, and further contending that the evidence did not support the finding that certain transactions lacked a business purpose, while the court reasoned that the statute in question did not mandate an express finding on intent for the assessment to stand, and that the evidence presented was sufficient to support the administrative determination that the transactions lacked a genuine economic purpose, thus affirming the tax liability.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Tax Assessment Review Regarding Intent and Business Purpose: The petitioner sought review of a decision upholding a tax assessment, arguing that the relevant statutory provision required a specific finding regarding the taxpayer's intent, which the lower court failed to make, and further contending that the evidence did not support the finding that certain transactions lacked a business purpose, while the court reasoned that the statute in question did not mandate an express finding on intent for the assessment to stand, and that the evidence presented was sufficient to support the administrative determination that the transactions lacked a genuine economic purpose, thus affirming the tax liability.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
taxations fiscales assujettissement à l'impôt contrôle de l'appréciation des preuves fins fiscales décision motivée enquête pour soustraction fiscale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was filed against an interlocutory decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to the cost allocation in the final orders.
Généré par l'IA
A/2603/2004
Tax Statute Interpretation and Transaction Characterization Review
A/1024/2002
Statutory Interpretation of Transaction Classification and Taxation
A/355/2005
Tax Assessment Upheld: Substance Over Form in Disguised Financing Transaction
A/555/2006
Tax Assessment Validity Based on Statutory Interpretation
A/58/2004
Taxpayer Business Expense Deductibility Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was filed against an interlocutory decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to the cost allocation in the final orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#"$!"%%# !&#'!"%%(

))

 )* **  )*   

+  $  # , "%%( 









..  **  /)*  *0 **+, !"#$%&'(&((   ()



                 

   /&-'/  

* * .

$ ,** '0*&..' 122* 1/*0* *,3*/$45  62,1* $*78 +99999999999999999999,  &' 0+: ("%'  +*2 ;<  $,*  * 7  , ! 0 <*0* *,;*0*,=:* <*>,* $,7,  ,?

1,2+,$$**$4 <   &'0*&..'?

$ ,** ()@*&..'1 @,1$$**?

1,*@, ,**  ((@*&..'2* 0* ;  ,  , @*2** <* <  <*0* *,  (.. A  ** ,*$+$,?

 ,$ %B&..'1 $*, *?

<  ).$+:&..'++*;, *:$* < C$* $!=**; ,*, $   9999999999 $,** D8E  $!=**$!==,$*?

<*0*,7 ,+*< $$,;*+*7C+ $!=**;$F0*+, *,>* 3F86;<C$*@ *** * ,?

 ,$ (.:&..' + ,;<C$ * ,*>, 4;F80* ,@7*  *?

$  (G0+:&..' *: , ,* , <22 C$*$!=**; + ,8* H$,** D8E$!=**?

<C$ $$  &G2,0*&..IC+ ;*$,  *>*  :  <C*,, >,,*, $*, C* !=!+* ! +  ,$  7 < 3*** ,$* *;6   7  *$*, 0* (..A?

$*,,*0*,7 ,+*?

< +*<C$*@ ***F8?

 *$0* ('+&..I*$*, 0*   *0*,  *  <,$*+     2, < $*  <,?



-&'&%-&..'  /)-'/    :0* &)+&..I< 0*  *C 2* $,  7;<,$$,  4(@0* &..%?

<0 $$ <C$*J$* &&+&..I7 ;<*4**!,J



*)* * )

 *>0*1>**@ ***36,,+ *2*,**, 4  ( B&..) *: *+$, '@>  $,* 0*/$,* '$$,(I@>3J(J'I  6?

*71* 1,* (I@>$ *:2, , &#@0*&..%3 D().(.I6  *>0* $,()2,0* *$****>$+ *: *  *,>   7 * @> **   1  1,*  0C@>?

2+,+7<J'IJ( *: * K**; *$,071*'I *2, , $*>,,  * * I:&...3 6;* *07*1/*0* *, ("@*("'"3 6?

+$,$@>  1$4**,:*?

 ,0*>(@0*&..)$$*: 1$4?

 ,$, 2+ ,*$,0$*0:3J'I I. 6?

**,;*0; <C$ +* +  ,0 $ <**+,   $,  * 7  ,   $!=*;*0* <+$L= <C*0*,*0?

<*  ,:* ;    $,,  *$*,  0*  (.. A  () @0*&..)&%B&..) '.A &'B&..)&0+:&..)$*  (..A 4)0+:&..)7@?

2+,+7<J&"J(J: *2, ,</*0* *,  ("@* ("'"3 6 *7$ * $M7 ; <,$,,+!$*, 0* %.A+*$  ,*$*:3JI 6?



-&'&%-&..'  /%-'/   <J&GJ( 0*>(@0*&..%3%4+,0** 6<, *7; 1**0* 7%.A+*7 +*/ <**0* 7'.A+*7*/; <**0* 7I.A +*7*4<**0* 7#.A+*?

<0 ;*$,4  *7*4 <*0* *, 4  ( @0*&..%?





)  .  )* **  )*   



12343   5  633 3  78 9(" :

  43 

(J ,0:J

 43

&J < +J

)J  ,**$$** ()@*&..'**; '0*&..'J

%J 7<  $$** 0*4 <*0* *,7 7+$ (@0*&..%J

'J <! +; :*J

IJ 0*   7 <  2* ;<* $4           ,**J

#J 2+  $*   ;1 $0 2+    $, L   ,*  ). @ 4  *2** $ $* ++ ,  ,  *: 2, ,   F=N*O=2;* I I..%     * C+$*J  ,*  $ L $>,J  +,+* *5 6 * *; C+; ,** ,*:**$  ,** ;,? :6 C$ $ ; +*2 * *+ $0* +   



-&'&%-&..'  /'-'/   ,**? 6 $  *>     $,J F*  +,+*  * $  * ,,+ ,+,,   6 :6  6 */   *:2, , $$+*4;1* 0 ,*0:J+,+* +*+!  $0 ;*  @* ** ;  ,** ;,  10$$  ;,,C$, *,3J()&(.I(.G6J  >22*  $,*          P*   8  *  



$*2+ $,L*2*,C$***;17122*2, , *$>22





-&'&%-&..'