Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/358/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/358/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Breach and Contract Termination Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/358/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether certain contractual actions, involving a complex set of obligations and remedies, justified the termination of an agreement. The court reasoned that the challenged actions, which involved the handling of reserves and the calculation of fees under the agreement's express terms, constituted material breaches because they directly violated specific financial and procedural covenants intended to safeguard the counterparty's interests. Therefore, the lower court's finding that the termination was proper was affirmed, as the evidence demonstrated a significant failure to adhere to the agreed-upon operational framework.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contractual Breach and Contract Termination Affirmation: The court reasoned that the challenged actions, which involved the handling of reserves and the calculation of fees under the agreement's express terms, constituted material breaches because they directly violated specific financial and procedural covenants intended to safeguard the counterparty's interests. Therefore, the lower court's finding that the termination was proper was affirmed, as the evidence demonstrated a significant failure to adhere to the agreed-upon operational framework.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
résiliation de contrat contrat-cadre validité de clause compromissoire manquement au devoir obligation de conclure nullité du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the distribution of court costs.
Art. 64 LTF
Applied for the granting of legal aid to the respondent.
Généré par l'IA
A/1830/2002
Contractual Breach and Termination Dispute
A/4464/2006
Contractual Dispute and Breach of Duty Affirmation
A/3770/2005
Breach of Contract Dispute Affirmation
A/983/2006
Contractual Breach and Damages Affirmation
C/13731/2004
Contractual Breach Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the distribution of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied for the granting of legal aid to the respondent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%$&#$''% #%()#$''(

!!

* !+* ,  *! ,+

%-  ./ 0  $) 1 $''( 



   22222222222 



,33+ ,  4*! +5++  **+, !"#$%&'(&((   ()

       

        ! "

   /&-'/  

 3+

(0 1 +22222222222+3  45060 *7, $*&. 7+8(""#09:+ ((7*&..& *8 $+*3* *8,: ;*,$<+*; *$, *8< *0

&0  ,** ()9*&..);55* ;/*7* *,= > !, < 1 + 22222222222 3  ( 5,7* &..&    *3 ;*7* *, *   +$,+* $  50   ,, $,*, ?   +$,+* * 7,  $3  5 1* 22222222220

)0 &'9*&..);,5+,$$** ,**0

%0  ,**  $$**  @ 7+8 &..) ;   * ,, ?  7+   +$,+*  $3  5 ,* 5+ 4 *$**,:5*+,$+*3 ,**0

'0 * ) ,+8&..);,*9, ,**0  4$*? ?;  ,, *$,  *8 < ;*   5  +  ?;*  *  +$ ** ?  +8  9 $, $  5< +** $,*  (5,7*&..&)(+*&..)0

@0 ;  $ *  # 97* &..% ; ,5,, < ;7*   *  +$*0

#0 7*, <  $ <    * *$5* A   6, ,*  $* +  =*/$3 6 /  1>   *  ("97*&..%$ * *+$9 0

B0 * &'5,7*&..%$,*,?; + *? +8+ $*   +$,+* , <  5  $  +8 9$,$ *CD0

"0  "+&..%6 /  1+*$**0



-&)&#-&..)  /)-'/  

 !,+

(0 *:7*;:**9 ***=>,,+ *5*,**, 3 (E&..) *8 *+$, '9:   $,*    7*/$,*  ' $$,  (@ 9:  =0 ( 0'@ >0

A*<;* ;,* (@9:$ *85, , &#97*&..%= 6().(.@>  *:7* $,()5,7*  *$****:$+ *8  *  *,:   < * 9: **   ;  ;,* 749:0

&0  *8 ***?++   * *7 <  * 5, ,  (" 9* ("'"  ;/ *7* *, =*/$3  F 500 ( 0   '@ 0 ( 0  C0 & >0 A +$, 3,8*$G $,**:0

)0  * 5, ,   $* :,,  *   *  @8&... = >  ,  7*:  ( 97* &..) G  +8 + *5**   +*  ;/*7* *,0 A  $ +,*  $*  7* ? * ;$$*? * H C, <  +*3  $**$?3:$$*87*:++I 5*9* *?+ ,+*$ *= 6().&).* 0(0(F))' * 0 (0&F 6 (&"  % * 0 (0&F 6 (&#  %@# * 0( (&@  ()@ * 0%8,50>0$,**:,?4+*,<+*3  *$** *;/*7* *,= FB)(0&.> 3:+  7*: 9?; )( ,+8 &..&= F B)(0&.(>0  *$** ,:  3*, *0

%0 *9,+$* 79* **+$,78 =0@.0( >0

'0 >C++5++?*$7$,  ;*7* *, * <$C 5?* ,3 $* *<  ;$C* ; A=0)'0( >0

;$3 *<+$,+*$C  45; $ ,0 A  **:*  ?*  7* ?   $  +* ?* *7H7,0

8>;0)'0% $,7*?$57,++< ?$$0 *$***7<+$* 5+ <  8 ** ?  ,** *  9: *7*  5* ,7,0



-&)&#-&..)  /%-'/    *  * 5, , ; 7    +$, ;, *  $*$* +$,+*   7+    ++ $  5 $,$, *7,0

  ,:  ;0 #(   A $$*8 $ :* $,7* ? ?  $ ;5$$+*,?;*7*7,$,$ 57, + $?*;$** $**$ ;* ,*;*,$;5 7 ?*7*0  *$** ,:+ $$*8  $*+ ,*5   $ 50 A*  $ ** $**$;?*, 8*:* ;*7*/</7*  5* *$*+,*5 9?;<   *8*+?;*5*=0#(0& A>0

> +*3 J A?J*J:*  ,+**$5$H 7,9*,$, *7, *85, , =*/$3

6 >  ,53 4 4 *  ++ * $,*, $ K*D LM   , 55,<M*C("#B4,:*3+ $, $J55*5, , *8 J* ** $*4< ++* =50 **7    /  / $$ *  $0 &B(  &B&>0 ?+ *8*7,J*$4*   8  * 3 ?  7* J*  7 $ / < J *8*45*0

 > J$3 + ?;$* +$,+* +* * * 7,0  ; $  $ , ? J*, $   : ,,*8,$3?,, *$, 7 *8* J*03 ** 7++* +3  5   $ ,*,   + I /* ; $ $**$, 55*++ <  *0   * H ?*  7  $* + +$,+*<; $0

 $$G ? **$+7+ $5 9*,$,,*,* $,0 J$,?<9 *? * ,* , 7,*5 $5$30

    * ,* ?* $,3  ?  :+ 7, $  $7H07*  90





-&)&#-&..)  /'-'/  

!  ,+3  !+* ,  *! ,+



6.7   8  9   4: ;<$ ,=

  7 

(0 ?78F

 7

&0 9F

)0 5+  $*   ?; $7 5+    $, H   ,*  ). 9 3  *5** $ $* ++ ,  ,  *8 5, ,   ACN*DC5?* @ @..%     * 4+$*0  ,*  $ H $:,0  +,+* *O > * *? 4+? ,** ,*8**$  ,** ?,F 8> 4$ $ ? +*5 * *+ $7* +    ,**F > $  *:     $,0 A*  +,+*  * $  * ,,+ ,+,,   > 8>  > */   *85, , $$+*3?;* 7 ,*780+,+* +*+!  $7 ?*  9* ** ?  ,** ?,  ;7$$  ?,,4$, *,=0()&(.@(.B>0  :55*O  ,* O     *66 P*A P        



$*5+ $,H*5*,4$***?;<;55*5, , *$:55



-&)&#-&..)