Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/357/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/357/2004 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract for Non-Delivery of Commodity

Numéro de cause ATAS/357/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a claimed breach of contract related to a series of transactions where an initial party failed to deliver a specified commodity according to the agreed-upon terms, leading to financial loss for the other party seeking damages for non-performance and associated costs. The court reasoned that the contractual obligation required strict adherence to the stipulated terms, and since the required delivery or performance was demonstrably absent or inadequate, the party claiming breach was entitled to recover damages stemming directly from the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations as specified in the agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Breach of Contract for Non-Delivery of Commodity: The court reasoned that the contractual obligation required strict adherence to the stipulated terms, and since the required delivery or performance was demonstrably absent or inadequate, the party claiming breach was entitled to recover damages stemming directly from the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations as specified in the agreement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle défaut de la chose différend commercial transaction financière longa manu traditio perte financière

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

The provision is cited in the final order concerning the allocation of compensation for the opposing party's legal costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&'($)($($  $*+,$())-



.  /. ! 0  .! 0! 

(1  23    %'  ())- 



  44444444444  



 

055 ! ! 0  6.!7 8  ! ' '() "#$%&



           ! "#

   1,*-1  

2)! 2'%!'3

!'!456 !++&(7,00-2 ''4!' '! 3

 4! ' &    2 '  )') 2 6   2 ' ! +. &(7 ,00-3

 4'  ' (2)( ' 2 4    4!' ! (2 ' ! (! '!.(',00.3

4!8'' & 2 '$ '54'  ' "  ) 7'5!2'&',00, 954$9 4)  ! )!   4) '  ::&)     '% !4'&'!' ) ) '  9 '8') 4   )&   !'  ! 2)! $  )&'' !     )'(    !4()' ' 7!4)  ! ) 5!)2) ' '(' )$/083

4'"'!4 )' !5'(2% '!+.&(7,00- ( 8' $2)!;

 ! 0 5   /. ! 0  .! 0! 

92:   ;  <   6# %&( 0=>

 622   <

+;  $4 !!$(  7))8'!4   '%!2'('!4&',00,;

,; )5!)''!   '&' 4 $! &!)''!;

-; )&  !'  $ 4  ! &'  '  '  )'(  < !' ' 2)&2';

.;    < 2 ' !  5  !)2   '(' ) $ /0 8; $ =: ! 4 ;

/; 22' '!4 ;/0 '8(2 '!542& 8(  2) 6 !!)'!-09!% '8' '22' ((!)!) '78)!)!>=?'@=85'AA00.

 *+,-./*,000  1-*-1      '<(2';!)'2 6 2:);()('!' B C'!'5< ( 5!)'' !)'7 '' 2! !)'' 5)37C<225( '8' '(2&'!(!   !)''3C2 ': !2)  ;>'()('  '  2  ' ))(  )())    C 7C   C '1!  '78)!)!22 ( '%54' !&!)'&7;()('!( '(" ! 2& 5'   9'  '' 5  !)''  5)   4&22 ! 5) )<2)!') D ;+-,+0A +0EC;



  :88'B  )'! B   '' 77'               





2'8(!2) 6   '8')<2 '''54$488'8)!) !'2:88



 *+,-./*,000