Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/350/2003 • CJ GE ATAS/350/2003 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract Regarding Timely Construction Commencement on Land

Numéro de cause ATAS/350/2003
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a party was liable for breach of contract due to failure to perform under an agreement regarding land use, specifically concerning the timely commencement of construction on a specific parcel. The court reasoned that the contractual language unambiguously required performance to commence by a fixed date, and since the evidence demonstrated that performance had not begun by that date, the conditions precedent for the other party's obligations were not met, thus establishing a breach by the non-performing party.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract Regarding Timely Construction Commencement on Land: The court reasoned that the contractual language unambiguously required performance to commence by a fixed date, and since the evidence demonstrated that performance had not begun by that date, the conditions precedent for the other party's obligations were not met, thus establishing a breach by the non-performing party.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle obligation d'équiper promesse de contracter longa manu traditio défauts de construction terrain propre à la construction
Généré par l'IA
A/3541/2006
Breach of Contract and Unreasonable Delay in Construction Performance
A/330/2005
Construction Contract Breach and Damages
A/4019/2006
Contractual Breach and Performance Dispute over Commercial Property Construction
A/4700/2006
Breach of Construction Contract Dispute
A/2491/2006
Property Development Breach Regarding Construction Specifications

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

    "#$%&$#'(#)#" "*"#(+'#)''(

",*

 * "- ."*"- / ""./ . "-/

 $0   )''(

)1 . 





 .222222222222   !"#$%&&%'%" ""$"(&(("







33 ./ ."*"- / -4""./5 6"-  */ 7." 8%&)*+ ,-!





                   !    

   ./01. 

"/ / 3" *

%&$(2(&%/123/441"#55     # 66  .   7(.-2 8(9($,"(%"#(&#%&(. &#(!"(&($2%"32&#%%:&#(!"(&($&;4<=

%"".(2(2(" (3%"&$2&&%+3/441=

%&22$!(2&%>>!3/441"# "-!'%"&$(2(&(9( "#3?&#%2((!'%&#%%22"2(22(&"%2 3?&2$=

%#(""$%(&%/4!3/441"%&$2&=



. /"* /  *

%"2&$(2(2&"# 22%2(3"2&#2((&2%&$"(&?%2 2%(! "% (9(( "(( & "#  @/ & " "( 2% " ( A$$" &% &(&222%22("2$!(A%%%>?!(/441=

%#2$'%("2?%2(9(&2"%2,"# 3?&2 $ 

: : :



2/9*2.  .101. 

" ./ * 3 -/ * "- ."*"- / ""./ . "-/

 

> 2"%2,"# 3?&2$ 

/ )"%2&%B" 

1 ('%"$&%2A%( 

C 9"2(2&'%D""2%!9%2"$2E &2%&$"(&14?%2&-22(9(("(&$&22$% (3%"9$&$"&222%26FG(HF9'%(;;44C  (2 :"(2 &$"(%E"A$ $(&(I8(&('% :'%D""&$(2("%&$2(3("(%"&" &$(2('%$=38:2%'%"2(92("2(%!(&& %&$(2(=822(A%%""&2$2 6("$( (2"2(2$"$2$%$$22%2"28388(.&22%2" (3%"9$&$"&222%2%2(-2%"%2 '%D("&!&$"(!3" $(&%2("2 )2&%!'%(2?(2(2('%"&$(2('%$"D!" &2"'%""""$$:$&($%%7 >1/>4;>4J8 



A99(I  $2(&I

((2 23""6

 





 ( 9 &% $2 E 2 (9($ %: (2 (2( '%D, "D99( 9$&$" &2 22%22("2"A99



2/9*2.