Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/35/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/35/2008 Généré par l'IA

Contract Termination Notice Validity During Receivership

Numéro de cause ATAS/35/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved a dispute over whether a notice of intent to terminate a contract, served by one party, was effective when the other party was in receivership, with the court examining the interplay between statutory notice requirements and the automatic stay imposed by receivership proceedings. The court reasoned that the filing of receivership did not inherently excuse the notifying party from fulfilling the contractual prerequisite of service, but the court had to determine if the service itself, made after the receivership commenced, was valid or if it was stayed; ultimately, the court found that strict compliance with the notice provision, even if complicated by the receivership status, was required for a valid termination, and any failure to properly effectuate notice before or during the receivership rendered the subsequent termination attempt voidable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Termination Notice Validity During Receivership: The court reasoned that the filing of receivership did not inherently excuse the notifying party from fulfilling the contractual prerequisite of service, but the court had to determine if the service itself, made after the receivership commenced, was valid or if it was stayed; ultimately, the court found that strict compliance with the notice provision, even if complicated by the receivership status, was required for a valid termination, and any failure to properly effectuate notice before or during the receivership rendered the subsequent termination attempt voidable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
résiliation de contrat validité de la notification condition légale suspension de la procédure congé tardif délégation de possession

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited in the dispositive section to regulate the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2398/2006
Contractual Notice Requirements and Termination Validity
A/326/2005
Contract Termination Validity Based on Notice Requirements
A/162/2007
Contract Termination Notice Sufficiency
A/2336/2006
Contract Renewal Validity Due to Improper Termination Notice
A/1841/2003
Contractual Termination Validity Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive section to regulate the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           #$%&%#'(() *#$+#'((%

,,*

- *,.- *!  -, !.

 / 0  &1 23 '((% 



 !"#$  %





%

          %"# %! &'()  



           !"   

   1.*+1  

!#22%!-%3.//04

4

#2! %56!"2%7128 94

:!!"2%2!2%!;4

  <2% !    =  %% ## #%% %#5"% 2># % =  % " % %  %% %4

?!!%4

 44444



*+,-,*.//0  1+*+1  

,  !*.5  *,.- *!  -, !.

  677   8

97: ; 6< +1 = ! >

-@ %$!=?%!?!= %56 !"2%AA%%!B+, 12"%!?6!%# A!6%%%@

.@ %=2#!%5%%@

+@ A"  2% !  =: 26% A"  %  2#% '% !  !# ! +/ ; !8  %A% 28 ! 3 A#!# 7&CD&A=E E//)  9 26!"%8!!% 23 A"#"%<%@,.!A#!# 3A#!#!-0 ; .//( 7 B94  "#" !  !% !=    "%A % ">!26%2%5%!%!"!%4!% '% !#  3 A#!# 2 6 2%  2 6 #%= < !% ! ?%@ ).  B@  2#% '% %  28  2 ! % 6=#""">!26 !6%'%;%$?6@     #!%F 5AA8F         3  



2A"!2#%'%%%A#<2%=:$:AAA#!# !25AA



*+,-,*.//0